[computer-go] David Silvers Rave formula

Hi, is there anyone who can repost the pdf (rave.pdf?) the following mails are talking about? http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/2008-February/014095.html Thank you in advance! Lars Pt! Schon vom neuen WEB.DE M

Re: [computer-go] David Silvers Rave formula

Hi Dave, thank you! > I think you can still find the original attachment here: > > http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/attachments/20080208/6519e9c5/rave.pdf Ok, having eyes is always good.. :/ I also found the attachment on my old computer right after asking here and the formula see

Re: [computer-go] cgosview?

Hi , I remeber a version where the call was just ./cgosview-linux-x86_32 cgos.boardspace.net 6819 > Hi! > > How do I use cgosview-linux-x86_32? By default it connects to the > 19x19 server and that "works" (displays empty game list window), but > I can't find out how to tell it to conne

Re[2]: [computer-go] use for Monte Carlo on 19X19?

The play-outs are japanese as well while the move selection is probably the same (influenced by the work of Rémi Coulom and the MoGo team) as yours. The urgencies of fields that are not of special interest during the move-selection are biased according to the territory statistics. The urgencies der

Re[4]: [computer-go] use for Monte Carlo on 19X19?

s would perhaps be an advantage for GnuGO playing on CGOS but show me a 9x9 game where you wouldn't agree with the scoring, I think such cases are really rare. Lars Tuesday, November 6, 2007, 6:08:20 PM, you wrote: JN> On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 16:30 +0100, Lars Schäfers wrote: >> >

Re[2]: [computer-go] ELO Ratings of move pattern

Yes! You are write. I haven't mentioned this. It's a good idea to swap them all in the form that black has the move-right. Thank you! I'll fix that. But not today ;) If you find any inconsistencies in the data please let me know! By the way: I forgot to cut the file at the end. You should only u

Re: [computer-go] Congratulations to Fuego!

Hi Nick, just two little comments to the report: - In your comment to round 12 you stated that gomorra doesn't support cleanup. It does. But if the winning chance is lower than a certain threshold it also passes in the cleanup phase when there are still dead stones. - Since the last tournament the

Re: [computer-go] Congratulations to Fuego!

If the winning chance are lower than a lower threshold it should > resign not pass. The only alternative to resigning in a lost position > is to play on unless there are no legal moves. > > Best Magnus > > Quoting Lars Schäfers : > > > Hi Nick, > > > >

Re: [computer-go] Congratulations to Fuego!

Well, gomorra can't see if there is a possibility to win through seki. I need to add some code for recognizing it. Passing before resigning was just a quick hack that took about 5 minutes to integrate. I agree, as we all saw, that this hack can lead to undeserved wins. If you Nick, are able to

Re: [computer-go] Handling seki - Was "Congratulations to Fuego!"

gt; be part of a seki and then forbid such moves. But there are a lot of > special cases and one has to be careful to only forbid such moves that > really could be part of a seki. > > There is no single algorithm but just a lot of special cases for > different situations. >