Unlike humans, who have these pesky things called rights, we can abuse our
computer programs to deduce why they made decisions. I can see a future where
that has to happen. From my experience in trying to best the stock market with
an algorithm I can tell you that you have to be able to explain
In your hypothetical scenario, if the car can give you as much debugging
information as you suggest (100% tree is there, 95% child is there), you
can actually figure out what's happening. The only other piece of
information you need is the configured utility values for the possible
outcomes.
Say t
I would argue that if I was an engineer for a hypothetical autonomous car
manufacturer, that it would be critically important to keep a running circular
buffer of all the inputs over time for the car. Sort of like how existing cars
have Dash Cams that continuously record to flash, but only keep
I am not sure how people are designing self-driving cars, but if it were up
to me, it would be very explicitly about maximizing expected utility. A
neural network can be trained to estimate the expected sum of future
rewards, usually with some exponential future discount. Actually, that's
explicitl
On 30.10.2017 19:22, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
this car and this child
In Germany, an ethics commission has written ethical guidelines for
self-driving cars with also the rule to always prefer avoiding
casualties of human beings.
--
robert jasiek
__
