[computer-go] 19x19 results (so far)

2008-12-24 Thread Don Dailey
19x19 results of 3,4,5 rank rule: Rank Name Elo+- games score oppo. draws 1 d2p 2050 21 21 273 57% 20000% 2 base 2000 21 21 273 43% 20500% ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://

RE: [computer-go] 19x19 results (so far)

2008-12-24 Thread David Fotland
I do something similar to this in Many Faces. -Original Message- From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Don Dailey Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 5:47 AM To: computer-go Subject: [computer-go] 19x19 results (so far) 19x19 re

Re: [computer-go] 19x19 results (so far)

2008-12-24 Thread George Dahl
So if I understand this correctly, you only allow moves on the 3rd, 4th, or 5th lines to be considered (in both the tree and the playouts) unless there is another stone within manhattan distance of two? What would be really interesting is if one of the stronger open source engines was modified to

Re: [computer-go] Nullmoves in MCTS and UCT?

2008-12-24 Thread Rémi Coulom
Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: Rémi Coulom wrote: Did you manage to get something to work with null move ? When Leela runs the first simulation in a node, it plays 2 moves for the same side, then does a playout. If the playout loses for the not-passing side, I add x lost games to the RAV

RE: [computer-go] 19x19 results (so far)

2008-12-24 Thread Don Dailey
On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 06:25 -0800, David Fotland wrote: > I do something similar to this in Many Faces. Do you have a better formulation of the rule that I could try on the reference bot? Basically, in the playouts or move choice I veto any move to the 3rd 4th or 5th line unless there is a stone

Re: [computer-go] 19x19 results (so far)

2008-12-24 Thread Don Dailey
On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 11:01 -0500, George Dahl wrote: > So if I understand this correctly, you only allow moves on the 3rd, > 4th, or 5th lines to be considered (in both the tree and the playouts) > unless there is another stone within manhattan distance of two? Correct. > > What would be really

Re: [computer-go] 19x19 results (so far)

2008-12-24 Thread Heikki Levanto
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 01:27:46PM -0500, Don Dailey wrote: > Basically, in the playouts or move choice I veto any move to the 3rd 4th > or 5th line unless there is a stone of either color within distance 2 > manhattan distance. Another version does 3 manhattan distance. I hope you mean that yo

Re: [computer-go] 19x19 results (so far)

2008-12-24 Thread Don Dailey
On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 19:43 +0100, Heikki Levanto wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 01:27:46PM -0500, Don Dailey wrote: > > Basically, in the playouts or move choice I veto any move to the 3rd 4th > > or 5th line unless there is a stone of either color within distance 2 > > manhattan distance. Ano