David,
I've found a description that Infiniband was improved from 2 x 4X IB
(20 Gbps) to 8 x 8X IB (160 Gbps) on Jun 2008 at the bottom of 6th
page of a pdf about Huygens system:
https://www.os3.nl/_media/2007-2008/courses/inr/week7/sne_20080320_walter.pdf
I guess that is the "better hardware"
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Łukasz Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 17:58, Jason House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sep 22, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Magnus Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > The results of the math are most easilly expressed in terms
> Attached is a quick write up of what I was talking about with some math.
>
> PS: Any tips on cleanup and making it a mini publication would be
> appreciated. I've never published a paper before. Would this be too small?
Better add an abstract, but what I missed most was bibliography.
[]'s
>>> It was 800, just like last time, but the networking had been upgraded
>>> from ethernet to infiniband. Olivier said that this should have been a
>>> good improvement because he felt that communication overhead was
>>> significant.
I thought Olivier had previously said there was very little ove
It was 800, just like last time, but the networking had been upgraded from
> ethernet to infiniband. Olivier said that this should have been a good
> improvement because he felt that communication overhead was significant.
>
Precisely, at the previous game, we had reduced the depth and frequency o
