In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jason House
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Option C sounds best to me too.
(C.) Hold it on August 17th.
Unless people here persuade me otherwise, I tend to prefer (C).
Nick
Ok, C is carried unanimously. August 17 it will be.
Another problem is the October KGS
Don Dailey wrote:
I hate to keep calling this MC-UCT because many programs do not use
UCT so until we come up with better terminology I'm going to call it
MC-BFS for Monte Carlo with Best First Search.
I think "Monte Carlo Tree Search" is a good name. The University of
Maastricht peop
2008/7/29 Nick Wedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I wonder if
> anyone here has any knowledge of the schedule of the Computer Olympiad, or
> of the date of the Gifu challenge?
Hideki Kato said three weeks ago:
2008/7/2 Hideki Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I strongly believe Gifu Challenge will not come ba
Nick Wedd wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jason
House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Option C sounds best to me too.
(C.) Hold it on August 17th.
Unless people here persuade me otherwise, I tend to prefer (C).
Nick
Ok, C is carried unanimously. August 17 it will be.
Another problem
Rémi Coulom wrote:
Don Dailey wrote:
I hate to keep calling this MC-UCT because many programs do not use
UCT so until we come up with better terminology I'm going to call it
MC-BFS for Monte Carlo with Best First Search.
I think "Monte Carlo Tree Search" is a good name. The Universi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rémi Coulom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Nick Wedd wrote:
October in the past. I wonder if anyone here has any knowledge of the
schedule of the Computer Olympiad, or of the date of the Gifu
challenge?
Nick
This is the schedule:
http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.
I agree that MCTS is a good term.
Lukasz Lew
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 13:21, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Rémi Coulom wrote:
>>
>> Don Dailey wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I hate to keep calling this MC-UCT because many programs do not use UCT
>>> so until we come up with better terminology I'
Hello
This is just a quick email to let you all know that the very low
volume sgf-std mailing list has recently had a burst of activity
related to the addition of new properties to the standard.
The properties relate to the representation of common subtrees. If you
externalise your search trees t
