Hi, Mr. Fotland
-Original Message-
From:David Fotland
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 7:40 AM
To: 'computer-go'
Subject: RE: [computer-go] Ing Challenge
>The Ing prize stopped when Mr Ing died. He was very interested
in computer
>go. His foundation still funds many go tournaments, but none
Mark Boon wrote:
> I suppose there's no reason why it has to be assembler,
> you could just as well generate C-code.
I don't think so. But I don't write that much asm as it may appear.
I see what the compiler writes when I debug and write critical
parts only. And automatically generated code.
--- Masahiro Okasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Mr. Fotland
>
> -Original Message-
> From:David Fotland
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 7:40 AM
> To: 'computer-go'
> Subject: RE: [computer-go] Ing Challenge
>
> >The Ing prize stopped when Mr Ing died. He was
> very interested
> in
On 29-mrt-08, at 10:47, Jacques Basaldúa wrote:
I don't use don't care. I mask code in 2 bits: void, own,
opponent, out_of_board. This produces bigger database size,
because the only way to introduce "don't care" is to repeat the
pattern.
OK, so we were comparing apples and oranges. I know th
--- Mark Boon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 29-mrt-08, at 10:47, Jacques Basaldúa wrote:
>
> > I don't use don't care. I mask code in 2 bits:
> void, own,
> > opponent, out_of_board. This produces bigger
> database size,
> > because the only way to introduce "don't care" is
> to repeat the
On 29-mrt-08, at 14:13, terry mcintyre wrote:
Considering how inexpensive memory is, and how
branches cause processor pipelines to stall, it seems
to make sense to convert "don't care" patterns into
however many fixed patterns would be equivalent. If
there are three "don't care elements", which
