Raymond Wold wrote:
> Don Dailey wrote:
>> No. cgos does not use GTP protocol for communicating with server.
>> Also, I have eventual plans to extend what is communicated to the
>> client and this is not compatible with the current GTP set.
>
> The more you add as requirements on the client si
>
> What language is preferred is dependent on the programmer, and
> sometimes there's no choice at all, without switching
> API/framework/platform entirely. Besides, open source or not, running
> others' code isn't always wanted.
>
> It would be so much simpler if everyone used GTP directly on t
Don Dailey wrote:
Raymond Wold wrote:
Don Dailey wrote:
No. cgos does not use GTP protocol for communicating with server.
Also, I have eventual plans to extend what is communicated to the
client and this is not compatible with the current GTP set.
The more you add as requirements on the cl
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Raymond Wold
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be so much simpler if everyone used GTP directly on the server.
> I am aware that GTP lacks authentication features, but it should be
> simple enough to agree on a command and say that that's now the standard.
