Re: Re: [computer-go] 3-4-5 rule

2008-12-31 Thread Don Dailey
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 14:45 +0100, Heikki Levanto wrote: > Of course a clever player who > knows about this can direct the game so that he ends with a moyo, > where the > optimal reduction move does not get considered. That sounds tricky, > and the > advantage from such is slight, he can be a tiny

Re: Re: [computer-go] 3-4-5 rule

2008-12-31 Thread Heikki Levanto
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:25:01PM +, p...@tabor.com wrote: > I think Heikki makes a valid point here. I am not a particularly strong > player (about 1-2 dan european), but I have learned that playing > defensively is generally detrimental to the final result, whereas taking > the initiative is

Re: Re: [computer-go] 3-4-5 rule

2008-12-31 Thread Don Dailey
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 12:25 +, p...@tabor.com wrote: > I think Heikki makes a valid point here. I am not a particularly > strong player (about 1-2 dan european), but I have learned that > playing defensively is generally detrimental to the final result, > whereas taking the initiative is more l

Re: Re: [computer-go] 3-4-5 rule

2008-12-31 Thread paul
I think Heikki makes a valid point here. I am not a particularly strong player (about 1-2 dan european), but I have learned that playing defensively is generally detrimental to the final result, whereas taking the initiative is more likely to lead to a win. If moves close to the existing position