On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 20:44 -0200, Mark Boon wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Don Dailey wrote:
>
> > However, the best thing to do is to ignore that page and go the "Bayes
> > Rated" link which is updated every day. This is the total
> > performance
> > rating over all time of any player
On Jan 14, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Don Dailey wrote:
However, the best thing to do is to ignore that page and go the "Bayes
Rated" link which is updated every day. This is the total
performance
rating over all time of any player on CGOS. Everything is rated
together, even if you have only play
It could very well reach 3.0 too fast - I didn't make any attempt to
tune this and it's my own system that eventually just becomes a k=3
incrementally rated ELO system.
However, the best thing to do is to ignore that page and go the "Bayes
Rated" link which is updated every day. This is the tota
On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Rémi Coulom wrote:
Mark Boon wrote:
I'm not so knowledgeable about the ELO system and had a few
questions about how it's used by the CGOS server.
Firstly, on the CGOS server page there's an explanation of how it
works with a table of expected winning percentag
Mark Boon wrote:
I'm not so knowledgeable about the ELO system and had a few questions
about how it's used by the CGOS server.
Firstly, on the CGOS server page there's an explanation of how it
works with a table of expected winning percentages vs. difference in
ELO ratings:
http://cgos.boar
