Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Significance of resignation in AGZ
Hi Brian,
Thanks for sharing your genuinely interesting result. One question though: why
would you train on a non-"zero" program? Do you think your program as a result
of your rules would perform better than zero
t is not a “zero” program, so I don’t mind ad hoc rules like
> this.)
>
>
>
> *From:* Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Xavier Combelle
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 2, 2017 12:36 PM
> *To:* computer-go@computer-go.org
>
> *Subject
Behalf Of
Xavier Combelle
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 12:36 PM
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Significance of resignation in AGZ
It might make sense to enable resignation threshold even on stupid level. As
such the first thing the network should learn would be
etc.
>
>
>
> *From:*Brian Sheppard [mailto:sheppar...@aol.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 1, 2017 5:39 PM
> *To:* 'computer-go'
> *Subject:* RE: [Computer-go] Significance of resignation in AGZ
>
>
>
> I didn’t measure precisely because as soon as I saw the tr
, YMMV, etc.
From: Brian Sheppard [mailto:sheppar...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 5:39 PM
To: 'computer-go'
Subject: RE: [Computer-go] Significance of resignation in AGZ
I didn’t measure precisely because as soon as I saw the training artifacts I
changed the code. An
Re: [Computer-go] Significance of resignation in AGZ
Brian, do you have any experiments showing what kind of impact it has? It
sounds like you have tried both with and without your ad hoc first pass
approach?
2017-12-01 15:29 GMT-06:00 Brian Sheppard via Computer-go
mailto:computer
Brian, do you have any experiments showing what kind of impact it has? It
sounds like you have tried both with and without your ad hoc first pass
approach?
2017-12-01 15:29 GMT-06:00 Brian Sheppard via Computer-go <
computer-go@computer-go.org>:
> I have concluded that AGZ's policy of resignin
