Although I've never done a RAVE implementation (soon, very soon), this is
related in the sense that AMAF is related to RAVE:
I have recently (yesterday, actually) done some experiments on AMAF with 5-vertex patterns (normal AMAF can be considered 1-vertex patterns). I was not able to
observe a
tscape.net
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 11:49 am
Subject: Re: [computer-go] RAVE problems
> -Original Message-
> From: terry mcintyre
> To: computer-go
> Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 10:35 am
> Subject: Re: [computer-go] RAVE problems
>
> Pe
> -Original Message-
> From: terry mcintyre
> To: computer-go
> Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 10:35 am
> Subject: Re: [computer-go] RAVE problems
>
> Perhaps the "context" attached to RAVE needs to be more subtle than a static
> 3x3 pattern - tactical a
The other alternative is to use domain knowledge as well as rave to bias
moves in the UCT search. I think Crazystone and Zen use learned patterns
for bias. Many Faces uses the MF knowledge engine combined with rave to
bias UCT search. I think this is stronger than trying to fix rave.
David
---
Perhaps the "context" attached to RAVE needs to be more subtle than a static
3x3 pattern - tactical and efficiency considerations may apply - a move may be
good when it defends or kills a group, but bad if it has no effect upon the
status - it may be wasted in such cases.
Terry McIntyre
