Sorry, I just realized this is about 6x6 go. Please ignore my previous response.
Dave
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: ma 29-9-2008 20:09
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; computer-go; computer-go
Onderwerp: RE: [computer-go] Analysis of 6x6 Go
I (EGF 4d) am probably
specialist on 9x9.
Dave
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] namens Don Dailey
Verzonden: do 25-9-2008 22:14
Aan: computer-go
Onderwerp: Re: [computer-go] Analysis of 6x6 Go
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:48 +0200, Erik van der Werf wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Don Dail
You guess also in go: side who begins wins game?
Vincent
On Sep 22, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Erik van der Werf wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:14 PM, "Ingo Althöfer" <3-Hirn-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Does someone here know of other (documented) attempts
>>> to solve 6x6 Go?
>>
>> Didn't Erik v
Don Dailey wrote:
> The only thing I know to check is to see if I am sending the proper komi
> to the programs.The only other possible glitch is that the version
> of leela I am using is ignoring the komi I send - but I don't think this
> is the case.
The problem was that Leela reset the k
even-sized boards have the disability that there's no
tengen. i think that this makes mirror go functional
until fairly late in the game.
s.
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
Ok, I resolved what I believe is the problem, it's an interface issue.
I'm now testing komi 3.5 to see what happens. If 4.0 is the correct
komi, we should expect to see black win the majority of the games.If
this happens I'll try switching to 4.5 komi. If white then wins, it
will be empi
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:48 +0200, Erik van der Werf wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know if even size boards are special, but it seems to me that
> > such small boards should have very high komi's. 4.0 seems pretty low
> > but then I'm
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:48 +0200, Erik van der Werf wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know if even size boards are special, but it seems to me that
> > such small boards should have very high komi's. 4.0 seems pretty low
> > but then I'm
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:48 +0200, Erik van der Werf wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know if even size boards are special, but it seems to me that
> > such small boards should have very high komi's. 4.0 seems pretty low
> > but then I'm
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 09:42 -0700, terry mcintyre wrote:
> To satisfy my standards of proof, games would have to be post-analyzed to
> determine whether either side could have made better moves. Duplicate games
> would be thrown out; games with inferior play would be tossed. We might not
> have
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if even size boards are special, but it seems to me that
> such small boards should have very high komi's. 4.0 seems pretty low
> but then I'm really no expert on komi's and I'm a pretty weak player so
> I'm not
To satisfy my standards of proof, games would have to be post-analyzed to
determine whether either side could have made better moves. Duplicate games
would be thrown out; games with inferior play would be tossed. We might not
have the resources to completely solve the game, but we could improve
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 15:17 +0200, "Ingo Althöfer" wrote:
> Don Dailey wrote:
> > I think a better way to do this is to self-play a few hundred games with
> > various komi values.
>
> Do you mean HUMAN self-play or COMPUTER self-/auto-play?
>
> When you mean human self-play, I am not sure that
I think a better way to do this is to self-play a few hundred games with
various komi values. The correct komi will be clear from those games.
This worked on 7x7 so I assume it would work on 6x6. Of course this
cannot be considered a "proof."
- Don
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 09:53 +0200, "Ingo A
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:14 PM, "Ingo Althöfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>> Does someone here know of other (documented) attempts
>>> to solve 6x6 Go?
>>
>> Didn't Erik van der Werf do it under his rules?
>
> He did it for 5x5-Go, see at
> http://erikvanderwerf.tengen.nl/5x5/5x5solved.html
>
S
Ingo Althöfer wrote:
Stefan Reisz is the author of the website
http://www.reisz.de/gohome.htm
There he claims to have a solution for 6x6-Go
with Japanese rules.
This is not a "solution" in a mathematical sense because
- it is not specified which Japanese rules are used
- during the scoring, th
16 matches
Mail list logo
