Re: [computer-go] transition to the new CGOS

2007-04-04 Thread Don Dailey
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 15:25 +0200, Unknown wrote: > According to the GTP-draft, you are supposed to use hyphens, not > underscores to prefix your private extensions. (I don't like them > either, would have preferred periods or semicolons.) Thanks for pointing that out to me - I would use hyphens

Re: [computer-go] transition to the new CGOS

2007-04-04 Thread Unknown
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 15:25 +0200, Unknown wrote: > either, would have preferred periods or semicolons.) Oops. I meant colons, of course. AvK ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-

Re: [computer-go] transition to the new CGOS

2007-04-04 Thread Unknown
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 23:10 -0400, Don Dailey wrote: > On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 23:01 -0400, Don Dailey wrote: > > > > cgos_player color name > > example: cgos_player white Lazarus > > > > cgos_elo color elo_rating > > example: cgos_elo white 1739? > > > > and since cgos does use kyu/dan,

Re: [computer-go] transition to the new CGOS

2007-04-04 Thread Don Dailey
Hi Heikki, I already reject using cgos_name because "name" is being used by the GTP protocol. I did consider whether to distinguish between the opponent and the player who is receiving the message. But it does not seem in the spirit of of GTP and in programming there is the similar principle of

Re: [computer-go] transition to the new CGOS

2007-04-03 Thread Heikki Levanto
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:48:05PM -0400, Don Dailey wrote: >cgos_name color name ; cgos_name white Lazarus 'name' is much used thing, and prone to misunderstandings. I would prefer 'cgos_opponent' or even 'cgos_opponent_name' to make it absolutely clear whom we talk about. >cgos_el

Re: [computer-go] transition to the new CGOS

2007-04-03 Thread Don Dailey
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 23:01 -0400, Don Dailey wrote: > > cgos_player color name > example: cgos_player white Lazarus > > cgos_elo color elo_rating > example: cgos_elo white 1739? > > and since cgos does use kyu/dan, I don't want to specify > a command at this time, but if I do it would

Re: [computer-go] transition to the new CGOS

2007-04-03 Thread Don Dailey
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 22:48 -0400, Don Dailey wrote: > Of course it would be nice if in the future, the cgos_ part could > be dropped and these commands could be standardized. > > The other possibility is to be able to specify the system in a > standardized version of the protocol: > > elo cgo

[computer-go] transition to the new CGOS

2007-04-03 Thread Don Dailey
I think the new CGOS is ready - I would like to make the transition soon. Probably when I have a day relatively free in case there are problems. I will have to update the clients, and I want to make them configurable (so they can be used with other instances of the server for other boardsizes.)