In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter
Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
The 2008 US Go Congress is August 2-9, which overlaps with the end of
the Beijing events. This makes a case for holding any such tournament
near the end of the Congress. Thanks for the tip!
In 2008, the European Go Congress
The 2008 US Go Congress is August 2-9, which overlaps with the end of
the Beijing events. This makes a case for holding any such tournament
near the end of the Congress. Thanks for the tip!
In related news, it looks like the 1st World Mind Sports Games
(sorry, humans only) will also be held
On 6/16/07, Peter Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's still a long way off, but I hope to organize a computer Go tournament
at the 2008 Congress here in Portland, Oregon.
Would that be in August? It might not fit well with the events in Beijing.
see: http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.fr/icga/eve
On 6/16/07, Peter Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
They've finally posted the schedule for the Congress:
http://congress.usgo.org/schedule_20070614.pdf
I'll be there, and I presume Erik will. Anyone else?
I definitely want to be there to meet other computer go programmers. It's
likely tha
They've finally posted the schedule for the Congress:
http://congress.usgo.org/schedule_20070614.pdf
I'll be there, and I presume Erik will. Anyone else?
As for a meeting among Go programmers, how about the afternoon of
Saturday, August 4? We'll be done with our US Open games by then, and
I
On 6/15/07, Erik van der Werf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So far, Steenvreter has never played on CGOS. I'm very busy with work,
so it will take a while before I have time to put it up for some
games. Also to be honest, I'm not really that interested. I guess CGOS
is nice if you have no other way
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 10:30 +0200, Erik van der Werf wrote:
> On 6/16/07, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 23:54 +0200, Erik van der Werf wrote:
> > > So far, Steenvreter has never played on CGOS. I'm very busy with work,
> > > so it will take a while before I have ti
On 6/16/07, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 23:54 +0200, Erik van der Werf wrote:
> So far, Steenvreter has never played on CGOS. I'm very busy with work,
> so it will take a while before I have time to put it up for some
> games. Also to be honest, I'm not really that
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 23:54 +0200, Erik van der Werf wrote:
> So far, Steenvreter has never played on CGOS. I'm very busy with work,
> so it will take a while before I have time to put it up for some
> games. Also to be honest, I'm not really that interested. I guess CGOS
> is nice if you have no o
On 6/16/07, Erik van der Werf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If Mogo had played B8 instead of C9 it probably would have won the game.
Oops, that should of course be B8 instead of A7.
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.comp
On 6/14/07, Sylvain Gelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Magnus,
Congratulations to Steenvreeter.
Thank you for your analysis. Did you looked at the first game
Steenvreeter-MoGo (MoGo was white)?
I wonder, because MoGo was really happy, estimation always increased, up to
81%, then in one move dr
On 6/14/07, Magnus Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congratulations to Steenvreeter!
Thx
In the second game against CrazyStone it played like a weak MC-program in the
opening - playing all moves in the center and allowing Crazystone as white to
make two rock solid groups which in my experi
Quoting Magnus Persson:
Quoting Sylvain Gelly :
Hi Darren,
After white (mogo) H2, MoGo was estimating 74%, and expecting:
H2 G1 H3 B1 A1 B3 H1 F8 B5 H4
Then black played H3, and estimation increased to 81%, white B3 and
expecting:
B3 B1 A1 B4 C5 C4 A3 C6 B6 B5
This sequence is a disaster f
Quoting Magnus Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting Sanghyeon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Agreed about move 50 at C9, but can black win after that? I guess
threatening seki means A8 after C9, then:
(first move white, move 50)
C9 A8 A7 F9 E9 A6 B8 C6 A9 is forced.
I have to change my mind again
5kyu analysis, so take it with a big grain of salt.
moves 10, 30 and 46 look questionable to me.
10 ought to be F7 (although this is arguable).
30 ought to be G3 or thereabouts.
46 should have been E9 instead of D9.
s.
_
Quoting Sanghyeon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/6/14, Magnus Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting Sylvain Gelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Darren,
>
> After white (mogo) H2, MoGo was estimating 74%, and expecting:
> H2 G1 H3 B1 A1 B3 H1 F8 B5 H4
> Then black played H3, and estimation increased
2007/6/14, Sylvain Gelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thank you for your analysis. Did you looked at the first game
Steenvreeter-MoGo (MoGo was white)?
I wonder, because MoGo was really happy, estimation always increased, up to
81%, then in one move dropped to less 50%, and MoGo eventually lost. I
wonder
2007/6/14, Magnus Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting Sylvain Gelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Darren,
>
> After white (mogo) H2, MoGo was estimating 74%, and expecting:
> H2 G1 H3 B1 A1 B3 H1 F8 B5 H4
> Then black played H3, and estimation increased to 81%, white B3 and
> expecting:
> B3 B1 A1
Quoting Sylvain Gelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Darren,
After white (mogo) H2, MoGo was estimating 74%, and expecting:
H2 G1 H3 B1 A1 B3 H1 F8 B5 H4
Then black played H3, and estimation increased to 81%, white B3 and
expecting:
B3 B1 A1 B4 C5 C4 A3 C6 B6 B5
This sequence is a disaster for Mog
2007/6/14, Sylvain Gelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
After white (mogo) H2, MoGo was estimating 74%, and expecting:
H2 G1 H3 B1 A1 B3 H1 F8 B5 H4
Then black played H3, and estimation increased to 81%, white B3 and expecting:
B3 B1 A1 B4 C5 C4 A3 C6 B6 B5
Actually during pondering MoGo realized that it
Is it a new engine nobody knows before ?
--- Sylvain Gelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> Congratulations to Steenvreeter.
>
__
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas,
está en Yah
Hi Darren,
After white (mogo) H2, MoGo was estimating 74%, and expecting:
H2 G1 H3 B1 A1 B3 H1 F8 B5 H4
Then black played H3, and estimation increased to 81%, white B3 and expecting:
B3 B1 A1 B4 C5 C4 A3 C6 B6 B5
Actually during pondering MoGo realized that it was lost then, because
black playe
> In the second game against CrazyStone it played like a weak
> MC-program in the opening - playing all moves in the center and
> allowing Crazystone as white to make two rock solid groups which in
> my experience should be an easy win for white. But Crazystone then
> played some slow moves and mad
Hi Magnus,
Congratulations to Steenvreeter.
Thank you for your analysis. Did you looked at the first game
Steenvreeter-MoGo (MoGo was white)?
I wonder, because MoGo was really happy, estimation always increased, up to
81%, then in one move dropped to less 50%, and MoGo eventually lost. I
wonder
Congratulations to Steenvreeter!
I looked at the games against MoGo and Crazystone to see what this
engine might
do. But it is really hard since most moves played by the top programs
are quite
good.
In the second game against CrazyStone it played like a weak MC-program in the
opening - playin
Steenvreter means "StoneEater". If the name is a concept, its interesting.
Sounds like tactics is all.
Chrilly
- Original Message -
From: "Hideki Kato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "computer-go"
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: [compu
Nick Wedd: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>are here: http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.fr/icga/tournament.php?id=169
>The winner was Streenveeter
Not Streenveeter but Steenvreter.
-gg
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato)
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.or
are here: http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.fr/icga/tournament.php?id=169
The winner was Streenveeter
Nick
--
Nick Wedd[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
28 matches
Mail list logo
