On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 14:16 -0500, Chris Fant wrote:
> It lost several games in a row on time at the time that I sent that
> message. Obviously, it can't have lost ALL of it's games and still
> attained an 1800 rating.
I assumed that you meant that of all the games it lost, they were
mostly due
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Don Dailey wrote:
I just checked this for January and here are the statics:
When playing white ggexp played:
1087 games
295 losses
8 of these were time losses.
When playing black ggexp played
1036 games
341 losses
17 losses
But most
It lost several games in a row on time at the time that I sent that
message. Obviously, it can't have lost ALL of it's games and still
attained an 1800 rating.
On 2/6/07, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just checked this for January and here are the statics:
When playing white ggexp
I just checked this for January and here are the statics:
When playing white ggexp played:
1087 games
295 losses
8 of these were time losses.
When playing black ggexp played
1036 games
341 losses
17 losses
So I don't see that it's losing all
To who it may concern:
ggexp appears to be losing all of it's games on time.
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
