I agree with what you say about UCT/MC and I think I made a similar post
many months ago. Essentially I said, just as you, that UCT is closer
to what humans do, it "works out" the particulars of the position.
I've always thought it odd that the approach advocated by many is based
on static ru
In the thread "On average how many board updates/sec can top Go
programs do these days?" mingwu said of the way MC/UCT programs work
that he'd hardly call it intelligent.
I've thought (and argued elsewhere) that the MC/UCT approach is
fundamentally more "intelligent", in the sense of working more l
