> Other than that, I am in the process of adding multi-thread support,
> for which I am using a boost library, which again can be compiled on
> pretty much any modern platform.
I used Boost.Thread for the first time recently (on a project nothing to
do with computer go) and it was so easy. I devel
What part of a go program written in C or C++ are you guys having
portability problems with? In dimwit there might be some assumptions,
like ints being at least 32 bits, that are not portable, and we use a
64-bit type, which is not described in the C++ standard (the C99
standard does have one). Ot
i'm simply stunned. i'll have to check it out.
s.
- Original Message
From: Hellwig Geisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 1:39:19 AM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Re: Java hounds salivate over this:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 15:12 -0700, ste
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 15:12 -0700, steve uurtamo wrote:
> my last $0.02 on this -- let me know when you've written
> a kernel in java, and tell me how fast your operating system
> (written entirely in java) runs.
>
> what? that can't be done? :)
Well, in fact that can be done... :-)
http://www
At 03:12 PM 6/15/2007, steve uurtamo wrote:
>my last $0.02 on this -- let me know when you've written a kernel in java, and
>tell me how fast your operating system (written entirely in java) runs.
I could point out that lisp machines had no other language at the
core. The entire operating syste
nt: Friday, June 15, 2007 5:58:19 PM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Re: Java hounds salivate over this:
> The approach that C supports is "chaos: deal with
it".
Is it an approach? or a mere fact of consecuences ?
I mean, people started to build C compilers on every
machine, thats all.
> The approach that C supports is "chaos: deal with
it".
Is it an approach? or a mere fact of consecuences ?
I mean, people started to build C compilers on every
machine, thats all. The standard library is less
standard than any other thing...
C was one of the first mainstream languages, also w
Now that takes me back to days of your. Can we run TECO on a PDP-10 emulator?
Early
versions of EMACS were actually written on top of TECO -- how's that for layers
upon layers
of emulation?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_Editor_and_Corrector
- Original Message
From: Dave Dyer <[EM
So long as we are all wrong.
Java is for managers who are insecure about there ability to manage highly
trained C programmers so they get together and with elitest academians and
design some dingo language to try to get a set of cut rate cogs they can fit
in their machines, and expect C programme
>
>So if there was any language which allows a programmer to port their code to
>be compileable and executable on a wide variety of systems it is C.
>
Java and C support two fundamentally different approaches to portability.
The approach that C supports is "chaos: deal with it". Figure out
10 matches
Mail list logo
