ithout standard deviation is useless. For
good reasons.
David
-Original Message-
From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go-
boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Brian Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 12:48 PM
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Subject: [comp
go.org [mailto:computer-go-
> boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Brian Sheppard
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 12:48 PM
> To: computer-go@computer-go.org
> Subject: [computer-go] Rating variability on CGOS
>
> About two weeks ago I took Pebbles offline for an extensive o
All rating model assume tha If A cab B B easily and B can beat C easily then
A can beat C easily as well. As we all know this is ususally true but no
always. I know I cannot handle AyaMC in KGS although rating of KgS indicate
that I should be favorite. I assume that these sort wrong skill set agai
>One must be very careful about proclaiming wild transitivity issues. I'm
>not saying it's not an issue, there is some going on with every program on
>CGOS, but with less than 500 games between any two players you are going
>to get error margins of +/- 30-50 ELO or something like that.
Actually w
One must be very careful about proclaiming wild transitivity issues. I'm
not saying it's not an issue, there is some going on with every program on
CGOS, but with less than 500 games between any two players you are going
to get error margins of +/- 30-50 ELO or something like that.
And CGOS r
When I get more time to work on Valkyria again maybe I should look
closely at the games against Pachi...
-Magnus
Quoting Brian Sheppard :
About two weeks ago I took Pebbles offline for an extensive overhaul of its
board representation. At that time Valkyria 3.3.4 had a 9x9 CGOS rating of
rou
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 01:48:05PM -0600, Brian Sheppard wrote:
> About two weeks ago I took Pebbles offline for an extensive overhaul of its
> board representation. At that time Valkyria 3.3.4 had a 9x9 CGOS rating of
> roughly 2475.
>
> When I looked today, I saw Valkyria 3.3.4 rated at roughly
About two weeks ago I took Pebbles offline for an extensive overhaul of its
board representation. At that time Valkyria 3.3.4 had a 9x9 CGOS rating of
roughly 2475.
When I looked today, I saw Valkyria 3.3.4 rated at roughly 2334, so I
wondered what was going on.
I found a contributing factor: Val
