> MoGo's parallelization has been published, but with moderate results because
> at that time we were only using ethernet. The
> same algorithm with good networks provide good results in 9x9 and very
> good results in 19x19. The trick is just that sharing only nodes of the tree
> with at least 5% o
I had read previously that Mogo used MPI, but I didn't know
if could work on clusters without sharing the whole tree. I have been
formulating such an algorithm for the past week or so, so I would like
to make sure that it hasn't already been done. Has anything been
written about Mogo's parallel al
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Olivier Teytaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> By the way, parallelizations (both multi-core and MPI) are *very* efficient.
> The use of huge clusters could probably give much better
> results than the current limit of mogo (between 1k and 1d on KGS with
> 64 quad-c
