On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:33 PM, David Fotland wrote:
> GPL is not infectious through looking at source code, but I didn't want any
> appearance of wrongdoing. And I was put off a little by Stallman's
> rhetoric.
>
> David
>
I have mostly stayed away from GPL projects for the same reasons.
Inste
o.org] On Behalf Of Tom Cooper
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:37 PM
> To: computer-go
> Subject: RE: [computer-go] Go + code + environment
>
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:19 -0700, David Fotland wrote:
>
> > I asked about looking at Gnugo source back in 2001, but the answer I
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:19 -0700, David Fotland wrote:
> I asked about looking at Gnugo source back in 2001, but the answer I
> got from Richard Stallman convinced me it would not be a good idea.
>
Please could you elaborate David? Is the GPL infectious through looking
at source code?
_
I use a Gnugo binary for testing the Monte Carlo engine, but I did not use
Gnugo for testing any older version of Many Faces. I've never looked at
Gnugo's source code. Since I published descriptions of Many Faces'
internals before Gnugo was developed, I suspect that some ideas from Many
Faces are
>
>
> Perhaps I'm mistaken in my reading, but isn't Mogo a clusterized and highly
> tuned version of gnugo? Things like that made me want to make this post. As
> I find the Go programming community more open to sharing ideas and code than
> my chess world counter part.
>
> Will gladly stand correct
course.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go-
> boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Michael Williams
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 8:22 AM
> To: computer-go
> Subject: Re: [computer-go] Go + code + environment
>
>
On 23, May 2009, at 4:03 AM, Gunnar Farnebäck wrote:
Joshua Shriver wrote:
> Perhaps I'm mistaken in my reading, but isn't Mogo a clusterized and
> highly tuned version of gnugo?
You are mistaken.
You may have mixed things up with SlugGo, which at least at some time
could be loosely described
On May 23, 2009, at 8:21 AM, Michael Williams wrote:
MoGo was inspired by Crazy Stone? I've never heard that before.
From Sensei's Library:
Warm thanks to Rémi Coulom who participated in Yizao's internship.
MoGo's early development benefited a lot from his sharing the
experience of pr
MoGo was inspired by Crazy Stone? I've never heard that before.
Ian Osgood wrote:
On May 23, 2009, at 3:17 AM, Joshua Shriver wrote:
I know with the Chess community, it's looked down upon to use others
code w/ respect to competing in tournaments. I'm curious, how is it
with Go?
Even more
On May 23, 2009, at 3:17 AM, Joshua Shriver wrote:
I know with the Chess community, it's looked down upon to use
others code w/ respect to competing in tournaments. I'm curious,
how is it with Go?
Even more so. A decade ago, a couple of North Korean programs were
alleged to have been pl
Joshua Shriver wrote:
> Perhaps I'm mistaken in my reading, but isn't Mogo a clusterized and
> highly tuned version of gnugo? Things like that made me want to make
> this post. As I find the Go programming community more open to sharing
> ideas and code than my chess world counter part.
You are m
I know with the Chess community, it's looked down upon to use others code w/
respect to competing in tournaments. I'm curious, how is it with Go?
>From my understanding, many projects are inter-linked, and even some of the
highest programs are derivatives of other engines. In the chess world that
12 matches
Mail list logo
