[Computer-go] Congratulations to AlphaGo

2016-03-13 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
an exciting time we live in and I can't wait to see what the future holds. Regards, Dmitry Kamenetsky ___ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re[2]: [computer-go] Library of Effective GO routines v 0.106

2007-02-21 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
=1.0 P(Black wins)=49.6% Komi=0.5 P(Black wins)=52.4% Black wins on average by 2 points (without komi). So for these random games a komi of 2.5 seems reasonable. Can someone also run the same experiments? -Original Message- From: Heikki Levanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dmitry Kame

Re[4]: [computer-go] UCT vs MC

2007-02-21 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
? -Original Message- From: Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dmitry Kamenetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, computer-go Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:54:43 -0500 Subject: Re: Re[2]: [computer-go] UCT vs MC > > On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 16:56 +0300, Dmitry Kamenetsky wrote: > > Thank you for

[computer-go] Library of Effective GO routines v 0.106

2007-02-21 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
If Black is the first player then why is he winning so little? If you are not using komi then Black should win more often then White. If you are using komi then the percentages should be more or less even, i.e. 50%-50%. Am I missing something? ___ comp

Re[2]: [computer-go] UCT vs MC

2007-02-21 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
From: "Sylvain Gelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dmitry Kamenetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:03:08 +0100 Subject: Re: [computer-go] UCT vs MC > > Hello Dmitry, > > > >> Your code says that the value is backed up by sum

[computer-go] UCT vs MC

2007-02-20 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
Hi Sylvain, >> Your code says that the value is backed up by sum and negation (line 26, >> value := -value). But I don't see any negative values in your sample tree, >> or values greater than one. How do you actually back up values to the >> root? >Sorry, it is value := 1-value. Thank you for po

Re[4]: [computer-go] Why not forums?

2007-02-08 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
ROTECTED]> To: Dmitry Kamenetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, computer-go Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:13:09 -0500 Subject: Re: Re[2]: [computer-go] Why not forums? > > On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 01:35 +0300, Dmitry Kamenetsky wrote: > > Actually this is all I ever wanted! Now if only I

Re[2]: [computer-go] Why not forums?

2007-02-08 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
Actually this is all I ever wanted! Now if only I could convince the whole Computer Go community to use it, but that seems unlikely :) -Original Message- From: "Joshua Shriver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dmitry Kamenetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, computer-go

Re[4]: [computer-go] Why not forums?

2007-02-06 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
I have been reading this list for nearly a year now and it is very discouraging to receive so much criticism for my first post. The yahoo groups was merely an example to show how easy it is to get a forum started. I also agree that yahoo appends too much spam to its forums and I am sure there a

Re: Re: [computer-go] Why not forums?

2007-02-04 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
In a forum you can read all the messages at once using your scroll-wheel. You don't have to click next-message every time. You can also add images and links, change font type. It would be nice to have a feature where you can easily draw Go diagrams, just like in sensei wiki.

Re: Re: [computer-go] Why not forums?

2007-02-04 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
But what advantages does this list have over a forum? A forum is just this but better and more user friendly! Also I have this problem: say I chose not to receive email notifications from this list, then how do reply to particular messages? ___ compute

[computer-go] Why not forums?

2007-02-04 Thread Dmitry Kamenetsky
Hello everyone, Why can't we use proper forums instead of this outdated list? Forums are easier to keep track of and search for messages. As a start we can use Yahoo groups. What do you think? Cheers, Dmitry ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@