Personally I think 39x39 is too big. Also, there is a problem with GTP; the
protocol does not support boards over 25x25.
Erik
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Petr Baudis wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:17:01PM +0200, remi.cou...@free.fr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thought it might be fun to
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:17:01PM +0200, remi.cou...@free.fr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought it might be fun to have a tournament on a very large board. It
> might also motivate research into more clever adaptive playouts. Maybe a KGS
> tournament? What do you think?
That's a cool idea - even thoug
Hi Detlef,
How does your program understand two strings are in capture race?
I tried the detection 100 playouts later, but it did not work well.
http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/2013-March/005827.html
It could solve some simple semeai, but maybe there are many exceptions.
Aya's semea
Hi Remi,
Aya can't handle over 19x19, but I'd like to watch that game once.
Hiroshi Yamashita
- Original Message -
From:
To: "computer-go"
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 7:17 PM
Subject: [Computer-go] How about a 39x39 tournament?
Hi,
I thought it might be fun to have a tournament
Heya,
I lately tried to think about, whether it would be possible to combine the
strengths of different bots, or at least different parameter sets/bias
systems for one bots in some way. They may shine at different
situations/phases during the game, but how to figure out, which one is
currently the
Hi,
I thought it might be fun to have a tournament on a very large board. It might
also motivate research into more clever adaptive playouts. Maybe a KGS
tournament? What do you think?
Rémi
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http
Hi,
I wonder which ideas are around for liberty races in playouts.
What nicego does: it reweights the random moves in the playout to make
sure, that each point is played with roughly the same probability.
This approach tries to solve the problem, that local playout rules
modify this probabil
