And using a clearly defined http web server protocol, probably built
around json, and then the clients will take care of themselves: all
modern languages, except C/C++, come with a good web client library, and
a good json library. Just hand out a helper C library, perhaps with a
C++ wrapper API.
Is anyone else bothered the line endings of cgos messages are being
transformed, which makes everything mash onto one long line on
my mail reader ?
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-
Agree as well. But would like to offer both options. Planning to
use github and make it 100% open source.
-Josh
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Christoph Birk
wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2015, at 5:40 AM, folkert wrote:
My goal is to move away from interpreted languages and release SOLID
On Apr 3, 2015, at 5:40 AM, folkert wrote:
>>> My goal is to move away from interpreted languages and release SOLID
>>> .exe or bin for unices.
>>
>> Are you talking about servers or clients there?
>
> For clients, PLEASE do not release binaries, release sources. No sane
> linux user installs r
> I disagree with that. Why does it suck?
(Getting a bit OT for computer-go, so I replied off-list; if anyone was
following the conversation, and wants to be CC-ed let me know.)
Darren
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://com
> > BTW I am a Linux guy true and true since 1994. But I am DAMN tempted
> > to write it in C#.
>
> I use mono on linux [1], and c# is an OK language for this kind of
> thing. RestSharp is an interesting library for web service *clients*,
> but of course you are writing a server.
>
> Lots of C++
> BTW I am a Linux guy true and true since 1994. But I am DAMN tempted
> to write it in C#.
I use mono on linux [1], and c# is an OK language for this kind of
thing. RestSharp is an interesting library for web service *clients*,
but of course you are writing a server.
Lots of C++ programmers on
>It's easy to get 20+ ppl saying OMG I want to help. But I need at
>least 1-2 more core devs outside me, especially if I'm working in a
>language outside my zone.
All I can say is, if you need 1-2 outside collaborators, you better
have a plan B. Everyone dances to their own tune, and no one wa
The desire for a compiled language with a web and Linux affinity and a
spec short enough to actually understand basically describes the
motivation of Go(lang) (http://golang.org/), doesn't it?
(As if this subject didn't have enough puns...)
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Igor Polyakov
wrote:
>
C++ is not simple at all. It's probably the biggest language out there
with the most caveats.
On 2015-04-03 0:13, folkert wrote:
Please write it in something common.
If you target linux I think it is unusual to target .net.
Why not just c++? Proven technology, simple to write in.
On Thu, Apr 0
Please write it in something common.
If you target linux I think it is unusual to target .net.
Why not just c++? Proven technology, simple to write in.
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 09:02:09PM -0400, Joshua Shriver wrote:
> BTW I greatly appreciate all the input! and put in TODO.txt
>
> Since I do plan
11 matches
Mail list logo
