On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Gunnar Farnebäck wrote:
Interesting. If I do the same with MonteGNU's fuseki database, which
is based on online learning from own CGOS games, and cut off at 200
samples I get:
E5 8101
| C3 2950
| | G5 1798
| | | G3 1145 (A)
And the results (win/loss %) ?
Chri
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Don Dailey wrote:
Recently I have lost some faith in my belief that 7.0 komi is right on
9x9 with Chinese CGOS style rules. I was never absolutely SURE of
it, but I believed it with a high degree of confidence. I still
believe 7.0 is correct, but I'm somewhat less sur
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Tim Foden wrote:
myCtest-AMAF is the final version ... I think it uses the 0.75 exponent.
Thanks. It seems to me that it may be worth trying 0.7 and 0.8 to see if
0.75 is a maximum or not.
As far as I remember I did that test ... and 0.75 turned out to be
be best.
Chrsit
Hi Christoph,
Thanks for replying.
Christoph Birk wrote:
On Feb 15, 2008, at 3:29 AM, Tim Foden wrote:
In your "pure MC program", do you use UCB1 to choose the next move to
search at the root? If not, what algorithm are you using? I'm
currently using UCB1 for my test in Fluke.
No, it uses
Don Dailey wrote:
What should the komi be for 13x13 Go?
8.5. Reason: In European Championships this leads to 0.5 games the most
frequently.
--
robert jasiek
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman
