>I'm wondering whether the formula to determine the balance between RAVE and
>UCT,
>beta = sqrt(c / 3 * parentVisits + c),
>has any mathematical background - or is it just a best guess for something
>that starts at 1 and is 1/2 after a certain number of visits?
I guess it is simply a kind of par
On 10/8/07, Tapani Raiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > May sound unpolite. But Deep Blue reached a very
> > important step in IA. They will be known for ever.
> > But, from a research point of view, they didn't much
> > really. It was mainly a technological/technical
> > achivement.
> >
> Maybe th
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 21:20 +0100, Nick Wedd wrote:
> I have added this to my report:
>
> # In its round 1 game with WeakBot50k, HBotSVN achieved a convincingly
> # won position with all the dame filled and 25 seconds left on its
> # clock. There was then some disagreement about status, and the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jason House
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 16:04 +0100, Nick Wedd wrote:
Congratulations to MoGoBot1 and to MoGoBot2, the undefeated winners of
both divisions of yesterday's bot tournament on KGS!
My report is at http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/pas
If they have a supercomputer available, maybe they will have sufficient
horsepower to add some interesting pattern-matching and other improvements.
Even Microsoft might do something right once in a while. ;)
IIRC, a few Microsoft researchers did some interesting work with SVMs and the
predictio
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 16:04 +0100, Nick Wedd wrote:
> Congratulations to MoGoBot1 and to MoGoBot2, the undefeated winners of
> both divisions of yesterday's bot tournament on KGS!
>
> My report is at http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/31/index.html. It
> doesn't say much about the play, more abo
Congratulations to MoGoBot1 and to MoGoBot2, the undefeated winners of
both divisions of yesterday's bot tournament on KGS!
My report is at http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/31/index.html. It
doesn't say much about the play, more about the seven new competitors.
Nick
--
Nick Wedd[EMAIL P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eduardo Sabbatella wrote:
> Deep Blue guy, but without cash, I don't see much to
> care about.
>
> May sound unpolite. But Deep Blue reached a very
> important step in IA. They will be known for ever.
> But, from a research point of view, they didn'
> May sound unpolite. But Deep Blue reached a very
> important step in IA. They will be known for ever.
> But, from a research point of view, they didn't much
> really. It was mainly a technological/technical
> achivement.
>
Maybe they will reimplement Mogo, try a null-move tweak, use a
superco
Hi everybody - especially Sylvain =)
I'm wondering whether the formula to determine the balance between RAVE and UCT,
beta = sqrt(c / 3 * parentVisits + c),
has any mathematical background - or is it just a best guess for something that
starts at 1 and is 1/2 after a certain number of visits?
A
Deep Blue guy, but without cash, I don't see much to
care about.
May sound unpolite. But Deep Blue reached a very
important step in IA. They will be known for ever.
But, from a research point of view, they didn't much
really. It was mainly a technological/technical
achivement.
Don't trow me veggi
11 matches
Mail list logo