CGOS is down.
There appears to be a physical problem with the cgos boardspace
server and it's my understanding it is being looked at.
It may be several hours before it is back -
since it is late here and I don't know how long it will be before
it's fixed.
- Don
> On 5/19/07, Thomas Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here is another Amsterdam paper on Go, although about life & death
> > and not full game playing.
>
> I may be missing the obvious, but in Section 4.2, Diagram 13,
> isn't Black 10 a basic ko violation?
Yes, that eats up one of the necessa
On 5/19/07, Thomas Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is another Amsterdam paper on Go, although about life & death
and not full game playing.
I may be missing the obvious, but in Section 4.2, Diagram 13,
isn't Black 10 a basic ko violation?
regards,
-John
___
Yes, see my later emails -
It needs to be:
gnugo --mode gtp
--score aftermath
--capture-all-dead
--min-level 8
--max-level 8
--chinese-rules
--positional-superko
- Don
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 11:39 -0700, Christoph Birk wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May
I think that this version is sufficiently fast that it will move in
time on most modern systems.
You could also throw out the result when an anchor loses on time.
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailm
Hi,
I have just updated my web page with the final version of my paper:
http://remi.coulom.free.fr/Amsterdam2007/
I have tried to improve it based on all your comments and questions, and
those of the workshop reviewer. I thank you all very much for your
interesting remarks.
I have not include
ok. Will set up the min and max parameters as per email from DRD.
Terry McIntyre
UNIX for hire
software development / systems administration / security
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message
From: Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:52:13 AM
Subj
On May 20, 2007, at 8:08 AM, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
A couple of quick observations:
In java it's usually faster on modern hardware to pipe serialised
objects through a gzip filter before you serialise them to disk.
Compression effort is more than offset by reduced disk bandwidth,
which is ofte
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 19:47 +0200, Ephrim Khong wrote:
> Don Dailey wrote:
> > I would like to get 3 or 4 volunteers to run a copy of the Anchor.
> > [...]
> > The Anchors will be fixed at 1800 ELO.
>
> Just a thought: couldn't different speeds of the computers running the
> Anchors lead to differ
OK, everyone running a GnuGo anchor needs to know this.
Let's make the default level be level 8 - since we want
to be able to very comfortably run this on slow hardware.
So let's make this the command for gnugo:
gnugo --mode gtp
--score aftermath
--capture-all-dead
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Don Dailey wrote:
Ok the 19x19 server is almost ready.
I would like to get 3 or 4 volunteers to run a copy of the Anchor.
The Anchor will be GnuGo 3.7.10 with these parameters:
gnugo --mode gtp --score aftermath --capture-all-dead --chinese-rules
Did you ever say which leve
Hi everyone!
It is really exciting and captivating
to follow the threads exchanged here
and I have the impression that computer go
is again coming in a very hot phase these days!
After having done a lot 13x13 in 2002-2005
( meanwhile with WinHonte, Explorer, ... 25 'classic' programs listed at
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 09:29 -0700, terry mcintyre wrote:
> I can set up tomorrow. How about TMGnuGo3_7_10 or something like that?
How about TMGnuGo-3.7.10 which is a more conventional notation?
I have set up TMGnuGo-3.7.10 as an anchor.
I think that this version is sufficiently fast that it wi
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 12:10:36PM -0400, Don Dailey wrote:
> Ok - I'm setting up GnuGo-3.7.10-H as an anchor.
All works fine. It has played one game already.
--
Heikki Levanto "In Murphy We Turst" heikki (at) lsd (dot) dk
___
computer-go mailin
Don Dailey wrote:
> I would like to get 3 or 4 volunteers to run a copy of the Anchor.
> [...]
> The Anchors will be fixed at 1800 ELO.
Just a thought: couldn't different speeds of the computers running the
Anchors lead to differnt strengths?
eph
___
c
On 5/22/07, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok the 19x19 server is almost ready.
I would like to get 3 or 4 volunteers to run a copy of the Anchor.
The Anchor will be GnuGo 3.7.10 with these parameters:
gnugo --mode gtp --score aftermath --capture-all-dead --chinese-rules
In GTP mode,
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-05-22 17:55
Hi everyone!
It is really exciting and captivating
to follow the threads exchanged here
and I have the impression that computer go
is again coming in a very hot phase these days!
After having done a lot 13x13 in 2002-2005
( meanwhile with Wi
This list is weird. I have 2 emails on this list but when
I use [EMAIL PROTECTED] it takes a long time for my post to get
back to the list - at least from my site. But when I
use the email of my local provider, it happens quickly!
So I'm sending this again since it's been 1/2 hour and the
prev
I can set up tomorrow. How about TMGnuGo3_7_10 or something like that?
MMM, with 30 minute clock, does it make a difference how fast the various CPUs
are, or is GnuGo3.7.10
sufficiently quick that it is unlikely to run out of time?
Terry McIntyre
UNIX for hire
software development / systems ad
I just sent out instructions on how to get on the server.
All I need to know is the exact name you want to use on CGOS
and I can set it up as an Anchor. Be sure to run it
exactly as specified using GnuGo 3.7.10
- Don
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 11:35 -0400, Joshua Shriver wrote:
> I can run one.
The 19x19 is serving games right now and is up and running.
Here are some temporary instructions on getting going until
I fix things up a bit:
1. You must modify the tcl engine client slightly:
1.1 Server is the same (cgos.boardspace.net)
1.2 Port is 6819 (instead of 6867 for t
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 17:35 +0200, Heikki Levanto wrote:
> How about GnuGo-3.7.10-H
Ok - I'm setting up GnuGo-3.7.10-H as an anchor.
- Don
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:22:19AM -0400, Don Dailey wrote:
> Ok the 19x19 server is almost ready.
Great!
> I would like to get 3 or 4 volunteers to run a copy of the Anchor.
Since I asked for 19x19, I think it is fair if I colunteer. I put one
running on my server box, a 2GHz Celeron, which d
I can run one. Let me know I can set it up tonight.
-Josh
On 5/22/07, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok the 19x19 server is almost ready.
I would like to get 3 or 4 volunteers to run a copy of the Anchor.
The Anchor will be GnuGo 3.7.10 with these parameters:
gnugo --mode gtp --score
Ok the 19x19 server is almost ready.
I would like to get 3 or 4 volunteers to run a copy of the Anchor.
The Anchor will be GnuGo 3.7.10 with these parameters:
gnugo --mode gtp --score aftermath --capture-all-dead --chinese-rules
The idea is to have at least 1 or 2 playing at any given time
Yamato wrote:
Rémi,
May I ask you some more questions?
(1) You define Dj as Dj=Mij*ci+Bij. Is it not Aij but Bij?
What does this mean?
Yes, it is ! Thanks for pointing that mistake out.
(2) You have relatively few shape patterns. How large is each
pattern? 5x5, 7x7, or more?
I
Heikki Levanto wrote:
> I think it is better to stick to 9x9 as the "beginners" tournament,
> where it is easy to test new ideas in quick games, and 19x19 as the
> "serious" tournament where we can see how good computers are at playing
> the game like we humans do.
I agree 100%. Other board size
Le mardi 22 mai 2007 01:52, Dave Dyer a écrit :
>
> I figured that a credible anchor player for 19x19 might
> need a lot of cycles, and need to play a lot of games
> at first, so spreading the load would be a good idea.
Maybe GNU Go 3.7.10 is _the_ good anchor player for 19x19:
- everybody use it
28 matches
Mail list logo
