Re: [VOTE] hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0-RC0

+1 - Verified checksums and signatures - Built from source with -Psrc profile - Checked the documents -Akira On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 8:55 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > > Hello my fellow Hadoop developers, > > I am putting together the first release candidate (RC0) for > Hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0. T

Re: [DISCUSS] Change project style guidelines to allow line length 100

I'm +1 to allow <= 100 chars. FYI: There were some discussions long before: - https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7813c2f8a49b1d1e7655dad180f2d915a280b2f4d562cfe981e1dd4e%401406489966%40%3Ccommon-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E - https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3e1785cbbe14dcab9bb970fa0f534811cfe

Re: [DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

Hi Sean, Thank you for starting the discussion. I think branch-2.10, branch-3.1, branch-3.2, branch-3.3, and trunk (3.4.x) are actively maintained. The next releases will be: - 3.4.0 - 3.3.1 (Thanks, Wei-Chiu!) - 3.2.3 - 3.1.5 - 2.10.2 > Are there folks willing to go through being release manag

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop Thirdparty 1.1.1 RC0

+1 - Verified checksums and signatures - Built from source with -Psrc profile - Checked the documents - Compiled Hadoop trunk and branch-3.3 with Hadoop third-party 1.1.1. -Akira On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 5:29 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I have put together a release candidate (RC

Re: [DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

dea. > >> > >> > >> > >> For Hadoop 3.3 line: If no one beats me, I plan to make a 3.3.2 in 2-3 > >> months. And another one in another 2-3 months. > >> The Hadoop 3.3.1 has nearly 700 commits not in 3.3.0. It is very difficult > >> to mak

[VOTE] Hadoop 3.1.x EOL

Dear Hadoop developers, Given the feedback from the discussion thread [1], I'd like to start an official vote thread for the community to vote and start the 3.1 EOL process. What this entails: (1) an official announcement that no further regular Hadoop 3.1.x releases will be made after 3.1.4. (2

Re: Are you developing Hadoop on Windows 10 Pro x64?

No, I am not developing Hadoop on Windows. I suppose almost all Hadoop developers use Mac or Linux. -Akira On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:50 AM /dev /local/ca wrote: > > Greetings: > > Are any Hadoop developers working/running on Windows 10 Pro x64 (AMD)? > > If so, how did you get Hadoop to work/run?

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop 3.1.x EOL

This vote has passed with 18 binding +1. I'll update the JIRA and the wiki. Thanks all for your participation. On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 3:03 AM Steve Loughran wrote: > > > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 07:14, Akira Ajisaka wrote: >> >> Dear Hadoop developers, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Tips for improving productivity, workflow in the Hadoop project?

Thank you Wei-Chiu for starting the discussion, > 3. JIRA security I'm +1 to use private JIRA issues to handle vulnerabilities. > 5. Doc update +1, I build the document daily and it helps me fixing documents: https://aajisaka.github.io/hadoop-document/ It's great if the latest document is built a

Re: [DISCUSS] Change project style guidelines to allow line length 100

Based on the positive feedback, filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17813 to update the checkstyle rule. I don't think it requires a vote thread. Thanks and regards, Akira On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 1:14 AM Steve Loughran wrote: > > +1 > > if you look closely the hadoop-azure module

[DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.2.3 release

Hi all, Hadoop 3.2.2 was released half a year ago, and now, we have accumulated more than 230 commits [1]. Therefore I want to start the release work for 3.2.3. There is one blocker for 3.2.3 [2]. - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12920 Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the 3.

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.2.3 release

Hi Brahma, Thank you for volunteering! -Akira On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 5:57 PM Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: > > Hi Akira, > > Thanks for bringing this.. > > I want to drive this if nobody already plan to do this.. > > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 8:48 AM, Akira A

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.2.3 release

t 2:05 PM Xiaoqiao He wrote: >> >> >> >>> Thanks Brahma for volunteering and driving this release plan. I just >> >>> created a dashboard for 3.2.3 release[1]. >> >>> I would like to support for this release line if need. (cc Brahma) >> >>

Article: Cost-Efficient Open Source Big Data Platform at Uber

Hi folks, I read Uber's article https://eng.uber.com/cost-efficient-big-data-platform/. This article is very interesting for me, and now I have some questions. > For example, we identified that the Capacity Scheduler has some complex logic > that slows down task assignment. However, code changes

Re: Hadoop-3.2.3 Release Update

Thanks Brahma for cutting branch-3.2.3. In Apache Bigtop, there are some patches applied to Hadoop 3.2.2. https://github.com/apache/bigtop/tree/master/bigtop-packages/src/common/hadoop In these patches, how about backporting the following issues to branch-3.2 and branch-3.2.3? - HADOOP-14922 - HA

Re: Article: Cost-Efficient Open Source Big Data Platform at Uber

ead opted for multiple Hadoop clusters. > > Since they didn't share profiling results or heat maps, we can only guess > what part of Capacity Scheduler is deemed slow or a possible bottleneck. > > Peter > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 9:48 AM Akira Ajisaka wrote: >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate to Yetus Interface classification annotations

Hi Masatake, The problem comes from the removal of com.sun.tools.doclets.* packages in Java 10. In Apache Hadoop, I removed the doclet support for filtering javadocs when the environment is Java 10 or upper. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15304 Thanks, Akira On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at

Re: Hadoop-3.2.3 Release Update

ahma Reddy Battula >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> Waiting for the following jira to commit to hadoop-3.2.3 , mostly this >>>>> can >>>>> be done by this week,then I will try to create the RC next if there

Re: jira-json goes missing sporadically

Hi Gautham, It seems that the jira plugin is enabled in the precommit job and the plugin failed. https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/6aa664c62443b4061c26c27376e5d1e0e591a323/dev-support/jenkins.sh#L176 Given the hadoop-multibranch job does not use ASF JIRA at all, disabling the plugin and remov

Re: Tracing the adding of Hadoop CI's endpoint

(Added common-dev to CC and moved general to BCC because this is a development topic) Hi Gautham, Yes, your assumption is correct. Every Jenkins job has a BUILD_URL environment variable [1], and it is used in Yetus [2]. [1] https://wiki.jenkins.io/display/JENKINS/Building+a+software+project [2]

Re: yetus isn't working

I faced the same issue, and I reduced the number of executors from 2 to 1 on H0. Akira On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 7:05 AM Zoltan Haindrich wrote: > hey. > > the post error is a consequence of the first one - so that doesn't matter; > > I've clicked on a few runs and this seems to be specific the H

Re: yetus isn't working

Temporarily disabled H0. On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:04 PM Akira Ajisaka wrote: > I faced the same issue, and I reduced the number of executors from 2 to 1 > on H0. > > Akira > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 7:05 AM Zoltan Haindrich wrote: > >> hey. >> >> the p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.2 - RC0

Thank you Chao Sun for preparing the RC. I've added your public key to the Hadoop KEYS file ( https://downloads.apache.org/hadoop/common/KEYS). Thanks, Akira On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:10 AM Chao Sun wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for the long delay. I've prepared RC0 for Hadoop 3.3.2 below: > > T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.2 - RC0

Hi Chao, > For this, I just need to update the hadoop-project/src/site/markdown/index.md.vm and incorporate notable changes made in 3.3.1/3.3.2, is that correct? > ARM binaries There was a discussion [1] and concluded that ARM binaries are optional. The release vote is only for source code, not b

Re: Possibility of using ci-hadoop.a.o for Nutch integration tests

(Adding builds@) Hi Lewis, Nutch is already using ci-builds.apache.org, so I think Nutch can continue using it. ci-hadoop.apache.org provides almost the same functionality as ci-builds.apache.org and there is no non-production Hadoop cluster running there. Therefore moving to ci-hadoop does not m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.2 - RC3

Hi Masatake, I faced the same error in a clean environment and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10561 should fix this issue. I'll rebase the patch shortly. By the way, I'm afraid there is no active maintainer in hadoop-yarn-applications-catalog module. The module is for a sample applica

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.2 - RC3

Thanks, Akira. >> >> I confirmed that the issue is fixed in current branch-3.3 containing >> YARN-10561. >> >> On 2022/01/28 14:25, Akira Ajisaka wrote: >> > Hi Masatake, >> > >> > I faced the same error in a clean environment and >> htt

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 2.10.2 release

Thank you Masatake. +1 to release 2.10.2. On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 6:52 PM Masatake Iwasaki wrote: > Hi team, > > There are over 170 fixed issues in branch-2.10 after the release of > 2.10.1[1]. > Given that there is still a need for 2.10.x, I would like to release 2.10.2 > after HADOOP-18088[2]

Re: docker dev on a mac m1 mbp

Hi Steve, I hit the same error. I'm not sure why this issue is happening, but I could fix the error by fixing the version. Opened a PR: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/4112 Thanks, Akira On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 9:13 PM Steve Loughran wrote: > I have a new m1 macbook and am very happy wit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.2.3 - RC1

+1 (binding) - Verified the signatures and the checksums - Built from source using the "start-build-env.sh" from Ubuntu laptop. - Setup pseudo cluster and ran some mapreduce jobs. - Checked the Web UIs and the daemon logs. Thanks, Akira On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 2:33 PM Masatake Iwasaki < iwasak..

Re: [DISCUSS] Tips for improving productivity, workflow in the Hadoop project?

opers and the reviewers spending more time discussing in the > PR. > >> > - the relation between a single Jira and Github-PR is 1-to-M. In order > >> to > >> > find related discussions, the user may > >> >need to visit every PR (that may includ

[NOTICE] Attaching patches in JIRA issue no longer works

Dear Hadoop developers, I've disabled the Precommit-(HADOOP|HDFS|MAPREDUCE|YARN)-Build jobs. If you attach a patch to a JIRA issue, the Jenkins precommit job won't run. Please use GitHub PR for code review. Background: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17798 - https://lists.apache.or

Re: [E] [NOTICE] Attaching patches in JIRA issue no longer works

s on both is confusing and splitting information. I would >> rather use JIRA with patches or GitHub Issues with PRs. I think anything in >> between splits information and makes it hard to find. >> >> Eric >> >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 1:25 PM Akira Ajisaka >

Re: [DISCUSS] HADOOP-15983] use jersey-json that is built to use jackson2

Hi Steve, I want to upgrade to Jersey 2.x in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15984, but it is very hard and has been pending for several years. Now I'm okay with using the modified jersey-json as a temporary workaround. I think HADOOP-15984 is a blocker to compile Hadoop in JDK 11+,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.3

Hi Chao, How about using https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1348/ instead of https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/ ? Akira On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 10:52 AM Ayush Saxena wrote: > Hmm, I see the artifacts ideally should have got overwritten by

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.2.4 release

Thank you Masatake for proceeding the release process. -Akira On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 10:12 AM Masatake Iwasaki wrote: > I'm going to cut branch-3.2.4 today. > If we need more time for 3.3.4 to fix the issue around HADOOP-18033, > 3.2.4 can be released first. > > Thanks, > Masatake Iwasaki > >

Re: Github integration for Hadoop

+1 if the current review process is kept. Pros: * Using PRs is good for increasing developers because PRs are very familiar for many developers. * Better UI. (no need to copy the diff manually for reviewing patches!) Cons: * Discussions can be split. However, according to the below blog post

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

Thanks Junping for starting release process. I noticed there are duplicated tags: * release-2.6.3-RC0 * release-2.6.3-RC0.1 * release-2.6.3-RC1 Could you remove RC0.1 and RC1? Regards, Akira On 12/16/15 10:17, yliu wrote: Thanks Junping, +1. Download the tarball and deploy a small HDFS/YARN c

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

My late +1 (binding) - Downloaded source tarball - Verified signatures and checksums - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Confirmed commons-collections is upgraded to 3.2.2 - Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0 using Hadoop 2.6.3 pom successfully - Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries successf

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

+1 (binding) - Downloaded source tarball - Verified signatures and checksums - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Confirmed commons-collections is upgraded to 3.2.2 - Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0/0.8.1-alpha using Hadoop 2.7.2 pom successfully - Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries su

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

Thanks Vinod for starting the discussion. I'm +1 for cherry-picking these issues to 2.7.2. As Andrew said, when users upgrade Hadoop from 2.6.3 to 2.7.2, they can hit the issues. I'm thinking we should reduce the regressions as possible. Regards, Akira On 12/25/15 01:56, Andrew Wang wrote: My

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Plan for Apache Hadoop 2.6.4

+1 for releasing 2.6.4 after release 2.7.2. I'll work on the list [2]. Thanks, Akira On 1/7/16 08:59, Junping Du wrote: Hello folks, Hope everyone had a wonderful holiday and good rest in passed weeks. We just had a 2.6.3 release on Dec.17 and now it is a good time to look forward to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

The general rule sounds good to me. > "any fix in 2.x.y to be there in all 2.b.c releases (while b>=x) that get out after 2.x.y release date" +1 > I would prefer this rule only applies on critical/blocker fixes, but not applies on minor/trivial issues. +1 Thanks, Akira On 12/29/15 23:50,

Re: [UPDATE] New ASF git policy on force-pushes / Tags / Stale branches

Thanks Vinod for the information. +1 for removing origin/bracnh-2.8 and origin/sjlee/hdfs-merge. In addition, I'm thinking we need to delete origin/master, which was pushed wrongly. I've already deleted origin/ajisakaa/common-merge before force-push protection starts. > — There is a general rec

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC2

Hi Xiao, > From a quick comparison between the releasenotes.html and the CHANGES.txt > files in source tarball, the number of total JIRAs is quite different. In CHANGES.txt, JIRAs fixed in 2.6.1/2.6.2 are not in 2.7.2. That is why the number of JIRAs are different. Regards, Akira On 1/16/16

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC2

+1 (binding) - Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball - Verified signatures and checksums - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0/0.8.1-alpha using Hadoop 2.7.2 pom successfully - Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries successfully Thanks, Akira On 1/20

The Activities of Apache Hadoop Community 2015

Hi folks, We wrote a blog post about the activities of Apache Hadoop community. http://ajisakaa.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-activities-of-apache-hadoop.html According to the post, the activities of Apache Hadoop Community was continued to expand also in 2015. We really appreciate the continuous co

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.4 RC0

+1 (binding) - Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball - Verified signatures and checksums - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0/0.8.2 using Hadoop 2.6.4 pom successfully - Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries successfully Thanks, Akira On 2/4/16 11:

Re: Looking to a Hadoop 3 release

+1 for the 3.0 release plan and continuing 2.x releases. I'm thinking we should consider stopping new 2.x minor releases after 3.x reaches GA. Thanks, Akira On 2/19/16 10:33, Gangumalla, Uma wrote: Yes. I think starting 3.0 release with alpha is good idea. So it would get some time to reach t

Re: Drop release dates in CHANGES.txt

I'm fine with deleting CHANGES.txt in branch-2/branch-2.8. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11792 Thanks, Akira On 3/3/16 13:55, Andrew Wang wrote: I'm more ambivalent about CHANGES.txt these days since it's automatically generated from JIRA in trunk via the Yetus script. It'd be g

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.7.3 release?

I'd like to help the release process as a release manager. First, I'll look into the jiras in the following lists. * 2.7.3 critical/blocker issues (19): https://s.apache.org/X5pt * 2.8.0 critical/blocker issues (61): https://s.apache.org/SXuo We should fix them as soon as possible to release 2.7

Re: 2.7.3 release plan

Thank you Vinod! FYI: 2.7.3 will be a bit special release. HDFS-8791 bumped up the datanode layout version, so rolling downgrade from 2.7.3 to 2.7.[0-2] is impossible. We can rollback instead. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791 https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/hadoop-project-d

Re: 2.7.3 release plan

Hi payam, Please send an e-mail from your address to common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org On 4/1/16 15:00, payam rastogi wrote: Please unsubscribe me from this group. From: Akira AJISAKA Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 12:15 PM To: common-dev

Re: [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities

> Also, the docs target (mvn package -Pdocs -DskipTests) is completely busted on branch-2, I figured I have to backport a whole bunch of patches that are only on trunk, and may be more fixes on top of that *sigh* To fix this failure, HADOOP-12022 should be backported to branch-2 and branch-2.8

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge Jersey upgrade(HADOOP-9613) to trunk

+1 for marking HADOOP-9613 as incompatible change and upgrading the version in trunk. Thanks, Akira On 5/9/16 12:12, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: Hi developers, We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there. One

[DISCUSS] Set minimum version of Hadoop 3 to JDK8 (HADOOP-11858)

Hi developers, Before cutting 3.0.0-alpha RC, I'd like to drop JDK7 support in trunk. Given this is a critical change, I'm thinking we should get the consensus first. One concern I think is, when the minimum version is set to JDK8, we need to configure Jenkins to disable multi JDK test only i

Re: [VOTE] Merge feature branch HADOOP-12930

+1. - Checked out HADOOP-12930 - Built by "mvn package -Pdist -DskipTests -Dtar" successfully - Added custom subcommands to ~/.hadooprc and confirmed they worked - Built documentation and it looks good Thanks, Akira On 5/15/16 02:33, Allen Wittenauer wrote: This vote closes in 2 days and the

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

Hi Vinay, Added you into committer roles for HADOOP/MAPREDUCE/YARN. Regards, Akira On 5/17/16 13:45, Vinayakumar B wrote: Hi Junping, It looks like, I too dont have permissions in projects except HDFS. Please grant me also to the group. Thanks in advance, -Vinay On 17 May 2016 6:10 a.m., "S

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

mail.com <mailto:vinayakumarb.apa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Thanks Akira. > > On 17 May 2016 10:59, "Akira Ajisaka" mailto:aajis...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > > > Hi Vinay, > > > > > > Added y

Re: Help with committing document to home.apache.org

Hi Lei, We don't need to do the followings: > ssh people.apache.org > cd /www/hadoop.apache.org/common > svn up The official document will be updated automatically. Now your name is in the PMC list. http://hadoop.apache.org/who.html I'll update the wiki to reflect that. Thanks, Akira On 5/

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

testament to that fact.) On May 17, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Akira Ajisaka wrote: Is there some way for us to add a "Contributors2" group with the same permissions as a workaround? Or we could try to clean out contributors who are no longer active, but that might be hard to figure out. Con

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

Added Arun Suresh into committer role in MAPREDUCE. Added Yufei Gu into contributor role in HDFS. Thanks, Akira On 5/18/16 14:08, Yufei Gu wrote: I guess I lost my contributor role in HDFS, since I cannot comment in HDFS. Best, Yufei On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Akira AJISAKA

Re: Hadoop branch-2 build is broken

Reverted e20542 from branch-2 and commented that in HADOOP-13157. Thanks Xiao for reporting this and thanks Sangjin for investigating the issue. Regards, Akira On 5/18/16 10:28, Sangjin Lee wrote: No, I think it is this commit: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/commit/e205421555841dbf482d6aa14

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

. Could you restore the role? Regards Kai Sasaki —— Kai Sasaki lewua...@me.com On May 18, 2016, at 14:13, Akira AJISAKA wrote: Added Arun Suresh into committer role in MAPREDUCE. Added Yufei Gu into contributor role in HDFS. Thanks, Akira On 5/18/16 14:08, Yufei Gu wrote: I guess I lost my

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing the automatic Jenkins jobs with Apache Yetus qbt

+1 from me too. -Akira On 6/3/16 01:41, Sangjin Lee wrote: Sounds good. +1. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:28 AM Steve Loughran wrote: On 1 Jun 2016, at 04:53, Andrew Wang wrote: I'm in favor of something that helps unify the current mess of Jenkins jobs. We do something similar for our intern

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

Now I can't add any more contributors in HADOOP Common, so I'll remove the contributors who have committers role to make the group smaller. Please tell me if you have lost your roles by mistake. Regards, Akira On 5/18/16 13:48, Akira AJISAKA wrote: In HADOOP/HDFS/MAPREDUCE/YARN, I r

Re: Cannot create release artifacts for branch-2.8

+1 for fixing create-release. I'll try to backport HADOOP-12892. Thanks, Akira On 6/8/16 07:05, Wangda Tan wrote: It's also the best option to fix create-release. If we cannot get help to fix the script, it seems the only choice is to maintain CHANGES.txt again in branch-2. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

or have to trouble others for that each time when there is a new one? Thanks! Regards, Kai -Original Message----- From: Akira AJISAKA [mailto:ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 12:47 AM To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and H

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

project has in its history. If the list is too long, maybe we can put them in another list, like OLD_CONTRIBUTORS. Regards, Kai -Original Message- From: Akira AJISAKA [mailto:ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp] Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 12:56 PM To: Zheng, Kai ; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

he.org/hadoop/HowToCommit Regards, Akira On 6/20/16 16:08, Zheng, Kai wrote: Thanks Akira for the nice info. So where is the link to do it or any how to doc? Sorry I browsed the existing wiki doc but didn't find how to add contributors. Regards, Kai -----Original Message- Fro

protobuf 2.5.0 failure should be known by wiki

Hi, I've installed ProtocolBuffer 2.5.0 according to [[wiki: HowToContribute]]. And that's why I failed to build hadoop and I had to downgrade protobuf to 2.4.1. Now I know HADOOP-9346 and HADOOP-9440 for enabling protobuf 2.5.0, but these issues have been left for months. So, it should be commen

Re: protobuf 2.5.0 failure should be known by wiki

Thank you for your comments. > create a wiki account then ask for write access & we'll set you up I created a wiki account. (https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/AkiraAjisaka) Would you set up for write access? Now I know HADOOP-9346 and HADOOP-9440 for enabling protobuf 2.5.0, but these issues have

Re: protobuf 2.5.0 failure should be known by wiki

create a wiki account then ask for write access & we'll set you up I created a wiki account. (https://wiki.apache.org/**hadoop/AkiraAjisaka ) Would you set up for write access? done Thanks. I edited the wiki page. Akira

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

Congrats! The current document (http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/) is now hadoop-2.1.0-beta. I want someone to update. thanks, Akira (2013/10/15 21:35), Arun C Murthy wrote: With 31 +1s (15 binding) and no -1s the vote passes. Congratulations to all, Hadoop 2 is now GA! thanks, Arun

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

Hello, The current document (http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/) is still 2.1.0-beta. Would you tell me how to update? thanks, Akira (2013/10/16 13:34), Akira AJISAKA wrote: Congrats! The current document (http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/) is now hadoop-2.1.0-beta. I want someone

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

Hello, The current document (http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/) is still 2.1.0-beta. Would you tell me how to update? > common-dev@ I sent to wrong address 'hadoop-general@'. I'm sorry to send the same mail again. thanks, Akira (2013/10/17 11:44), Akira AJISAKA w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

Thanks! (2013/10/18 14:12), Arun C Murthy wrote: Sorry, I've been away sick and hence the silence. I just started a discussion on the *-dev@ lists on "Managing docs"... once we all agree, I'll fix the links. Makes sense? thanks, Arun On Oct 17, 2013, at 11:56 AM,

Re: Managing docs with hadoop-1 & hadoop-2

# Have stable1/stable2 links: http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable1 -> hadoop-1.x http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable2 -> hadoop-2.x +1, would also make: current -> stable2(since v2 is the latest) stable -> stable1 (for compatibility) +1, Eli's proposal looks good to me. - T

Re: Maintaining documentations

Hi All, I wrote several patches for documentation but most of them are not reviewed. I want to improve not only the new features but also the documents. I also think the documents are not well maintained mainly because : * Deprecated commands and parameters still exist. * Undocumented command

Re: Maintaining documentations

hat need reviewing if you have it handy. Thanks for your efforts to clean up the documentation. Unfortunately some fixes can get lost in the noise and this is true not just for documentation fixes, so thanks for bringing these to our attention. Regards, Arpit On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:47 PM,

Re: Maintaining documentations

ebased HDFS-5492 - I will review it this week. HADOOP-6350 - not sure of the status. Is the attached patch ready for review? I will look at the other common/HDFS patches as I get time after this week, unless another committer wants to take a look. Arpit On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Akira AJISAK

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.3.0

+1 (non-binding) - Upgraded HDFS including snapshots from 2.2. - Ran a few sample jobs. - WebUI looks good. Thanks, Akira (2014/02/12 7:09), Karthik Kambatla wrote: +1 (non-binding) Built source. Brought up a pseudo-cluster with manual RM HA. Ran a few MR examples. On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 a

The Activities of Apache Hadoop Community

Hi all, We collected and analyzed JIRA tickets to investigate the activities of Apache Hadoop Community in 2013. http://ajisakaa.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-activities-of-apache-hadoop.html We counted the number of the organizations, the lines of code, and the number of the issues. As a result, we

Re: Thinking ahead

+1 (non-binding) for 2.4.1 release. > We can debate whether or June is too early for hadoop-2.5 and it's > contents, but I recollect there was consensus that releases every 6 > weeks (or so) makes sense. Also, +1 (non-binding) for the 6 weeks (or so) timeline releases. However, I'm thinking it's

Re: Text cmd in webhdfs

# Added hdfs-dev@ Hi Nikita, I'm personally very interested in the functionality! Please create a issue on ASF JIRA and attach your patch. Here is the documentation of creating a patch and attaching it. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute Thanks, Akira (2014/04/25 2:09), Nikita Make

Re: hadoop-2.4.1

Hi Arun, I'd like to know when to release Hadoop 2.4.1. It looks like all of the blockers have been resolved. Thanks, Akira (2014/04/24 5:59), Arun C Murthy wrote: Folks, Here is a handy short-cut to track 2.4.1: http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.4.1-blockers I'm hoping we can get the majori

/docs/current doesn't point to 2.4.0

Hi committers, Currently the latest version is 2.4.0, but http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/ points to 2.3.0. Would you mind updating the link to point to the latest version? Thanks Jacek for reporting this. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10620 Regards, Akira

Re: Issues in compiling Hadoop Maven Plugins Project

Hi Yogesh, You can file it under Hadoop Common. Thanks, Akira (2014/05/20 20:35), Yogesh Tewari wrote: Hi Team, Where will I raise JIRA for issues related to "Apache Hadoop Maven Plugins" project. Will that be under Hadoop Common? Regards, Yogesh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.4.1

I think we should include this issue in 2.4.1, so I uploaded a patch to fix it. I'll appreciate your review. Thanks, Akira (2014/06/18 12:13), Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: There is one item [MAPREDUCE-5830 HostUtil.getTaskLogUrl is not backwards binary compatible with 2.3] marked for 2.4.

Re: hadoop-2.5 - June end?

Extended attributes (HDFS-2006) is already merged to branch-2, so I'll update the Roadmap wiki to change it from 2.6 to 2.5. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks, Akira (2014/06/23 16:28), Tsuyoshi OZAWA wrote: IMHO, I'd like to +1 to include YARN-1492 and work-preserving restart in 2.6. I b

Re: [VOTE] Change by-laws on release votes: 5 days instead of 7

+1 (non-binding) (2014/06/24 10:33), Zhijie Shen wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: +1 (binding) -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: Folks, As discussed, I'd like to call a v

Re: Moving to JDK7, JDK8 and new major releases

+1 (non-binding) for 2.5 to be the last release to ensure JDK6. >>> My higher-level goal though is to avoid going through this same pain >>> again when JDK7 goes EOL. I'd like to do a JDK8-based release >>> before then for this reason. This is why I suggested skipping an >>> intermediate 2.x+JDK7

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.4.1

Thanks Arun for another RC! I'm +1 (non-binding) for RC2. HDFS-6527 should be reverted because the issue is only in 2.5 and trunk. In addition, I hope HDFS-6591 to be merged. Other than that, RC1 is good to me. I tested RC1 with distributed cluster on CentOS 6.3: - Successful build from src

Jenkins build fails

Hi Hadoop developers, Now Jenkins is failing with the below message. I'm thinking this is caused by the upgrade of Jenkins server. After the upgrade, the version of svn client was also upgraded, so the following errors occurred. It will be fixed by executing 'svn upgrade' before executing other s

Re: Jenkins build fails

Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10804 Please correct me if I am wrong.. Thanks, Akira (2014/07/09 11:24), Akira AJISAKA wrote: > Hi Hadoop developers, > > Now Jenkins is failing with the below message. > I'm thinking this is caused by the upgrade of Jenkin

'current' document links to 2.3.0

Hi, I noticed http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/ linked to 2.3.0. Now 2.4.1 is the latest release, would you please update the link? Thanks, Akira

Re: 'current' document links to 2.3.0

r 2.5 :) [1] http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Akira AJISAKA wrote: Hi, I noticed http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/ linked to 2.3.0. Now 2.4.1 is the latest release, would you please update the link? Thanks, Akira

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 RC2

-1 (non-binding) + downloaded tarball and deployed HDFS-HA cluster + confirmed HDFS Rolling Upgrade from 2.4.0 + ran some sample jobs - documents are missing in tarball In 2.4.1 release, the documents were deployed at share/doc/hadoop/ . Would you please re-create a tarball with adding -Pdoc opt

Re: [VOTE] Migration from subversion to git for version control

+1 (non-binding), I don't use subversion at all in creating patches. After the migration, we need to change test-patch.sh to use git. Thanks, Akira (2014/08/11 7:18), Mit Desai wrote: +1 non binding. -M!T On Aug 10, 2014 4:12 PM, Chen He wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 3:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 RC2

Thanks Karthik for the update, but the some documents are not included. It looks to me that *.apt.vm files are not compiled. Would you please generate documents with 'mvn site site:stage /path/to/deploy'? I'm +1 (non-binding) if the documents are included. Thanks, Akira (2014/08/12 13:49), Kar

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >