Hi, any more feedback for this proposal?
> 下面是被转发的邮件：
>
> 发件人: zhangjian <1361320...@qq.com>
> 主题: 回复：[Discuss] RBF: Aynchronous router RPC.
> 日期: 2024年5月25日 GMT+8 17:23:31
> 收件人: Yuanbo Liu
> 抄送: Xiaoqiao He , Ayush Saxena ,
> inigo...@apache.org, Sangjin Lee , Simbarashe Dzinamarira
> , comm
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1406/
No changes
-1 overall
The following subsystems voted -1:
asflicense hadolint mvnsite pathlen unit
The following subsystems voted -1 but
were configured to be filtered/ignored:
cc
Sounds good. Thanks for sharing your findings.
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 2:24 AM zhangjian <1361320...@qq.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone, I conducted a performance comparison test between sync and
> asynchronous router, and the test results showed that in single ns or multi
> ns scenarios, Asynchrono
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mukund Thakur resolved HADOOP-19184.
Fix Version/s: 3.4.1
Resolution: Fixed
> TestStagingCommitter.testJobCommitFailure
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1593/
No changes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hado
Some of the recent PRs that require full build runs, it seems that the
builds are not able to get the build results posted to the PRs. Just wanted
to check if anyone has any ideas reg this.
Sample recent PRs:
- https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6830
- https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mukund Thakur resolved HADOOP-18679.
Resolution: Fixed
> Add API for bulk/paged delete of files and objects
>
Thanx folks, I had a very quick pass on the PDF and it looks good.
Maybe some doubts around the fact where it was mentioned that if a
Namenode returns a StandbyException or something on similar lines, the
Router will retry, I think we have some logic in RouterRpcClient
checking for such case, if i
Most important, yetus report is usually not available in such cases. e.g.
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6830/2/Yetus_20Report/
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 2:05 PM Viraj Jasani wrote:
> Some of the recent PRs that require full build runs, it seems that the
> builds are n
Thank you for taking the time to review this proposal.
Your opinion does point out the key issues to designing an asynchronous router,
but my proposal can address these issues:
1. My design does not affect the functionality of existing synchronous routers
in throwing stanby or retry exceptions an
Thanx for the details, sounds cool, good luck with the feature!!!
-Ayush
> On 29 May 2024, at 8:56 AM, zhangjian <1361320...@qq.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you for taking the time to review this proposal.
> Your opinion does point out the key issues to designing an asynchronous
> router, but my prop
11 matches
Mail list logo
