[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-11869) checkstyle rules/script need re-visiting

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer resolved HADOOP-11869. --- Resolution: Duplicate Closing this as a dupe of HADOOP-11866. > checkstyle rules/sc

Re: IMPORTANT: testing patches for branches

On Apr 24, 2015, at 3:09 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: > The patch artifact directory on has been removed! > This is a fatal error for test-patch.sh. Aborting. > Jenkins (node H8) information at > https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/7477/ may provide some > hints. ( did I mi

Re: IMPORTANT: testing patches for branches

On Apr 23, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Sidharta Seethana wrote: > About (3.) , a lot of the check style rules seem to be arcane/unnecessary. > Please see : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11869 a) I've closed it as a dupe of HADOOP-11866 to keep everything in one place. b) I've had HADO

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-11875) [JDK8] Renaming _ as a one-character identifier to another identifier

Tsuyoshi Ozawa created HADOOP-11875: --- Summary: [JDK8] Renaming _ as a one-character identifier to another identifier Key: HADOOP-11875 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11875 Project

Re: Which newbie Jira's need work?

Hi Chris, Thanks for the info, I'm working through the newbie list and trying to pick anything up that seems simple. So, I got to MAPREDUCE-5673 and while this looks easy I asked myself if it was even worth doing? My reasoning is that this was raised by somebody who thinks it's a good idea to ha

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-11876) Refactor code to make it more readable, minor maybePrintStats bug

Zoran Dimitrijevic created HADOOP-11876: --- Summary: Refactor code to make it more readable, minor maybePrintStats bug Key: HADOOP-11876 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11876 Pro

Re: Which newbie Jira's need work?

Hi Darrell, Those are great questions. This relates to project governance, so if you haven't already seen our bylaws, I recommend taking a look. https://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html The word "bylaws" sounds intimidating, but don't worry. It's a short document. :-) What you're describing so

Re: IMPORTANT: testing patches for branches

Allen, I am not questioning whether checkstyle is a requirement. My concern is that some of the rules in there are arcane/unnecessary - we should use a better list of rules, in my opinion. This is why I filed HADOOP-11869. As pointed out by Jason, this is not a dupe of HADOOP-11866