Hi Tsuyoshi,
I just checked Hadoop wiki on HowToContribute and it points ProtocolBuffer
things to YARN Readme which is already updated to 2.5.0 now.
Thanks,
Junping
- Original Message -
From: "Tsuyoshi OZAWA"
To: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org, yarn-...@
When will Hadoop get better IPv6 support? It would be nice if Ubuntu users
didn't have to disable IPv6 in order to get Hadoop working.
Hey Andrew,
I'm not aware of anyone working on IPv6 support.
The following looks up to date and may be helpful:
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopIPv6
Thanks,
Eli
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Andrew Pennebaker
wrote:
> When will Hadoop get better IPv6 support? It would be nice if Ubuntu
Thanks for the link!
I understand a lack of support *for* IPv6, what I don't understand is why
IPv6 must be disabled in order for Hadoop to work. On systems with both
IPv4 and IPv6, I thought IPv4 apps could ignore IPv6 as if it weren't
available. I suppose that's not quite right.
On Fri, Aug 16
We have found HADOOP-9880, which prevents Namenode HA from running with
security.
Kihwal
From: Arun C Murthy
To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" ;
"hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org" ;
"mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" ;
"yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org"
Sent: Thursda
We have found HADOOP-9880, which prevents Namenode HA from running with
security.
Kihwal
From: Arun C Murthy
To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" ;
"hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org" ;
"mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" ;
"yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org"
Sent: Thurs
On 16 August 2013 10:05, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
> Thanks for the link!
>
> I understand a lack of support *for* IPv6, what I don't understand is why
> IPv6 must be disabled in order for Hadoop to work. On systems with both
> IPv4 and IPv6, I thought IPv4 apps could ignore IPv6 as if it weren't
Ok, I'll spin RC3. Can you please help get this in asap? Thanks, much
appreciated!
Arun
On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Kihwal Lee wrote:
> We have found HADOOP-9880, which prevents Namenode HA from running with
> security.
>
>
>
> Kihwal
>
>
>
> From: Arun
On 16 August 2013 02:50, Jun Ping Du wrote:
> Hi Tsuyoshi,
>I just checked Hadoop wiki on HowToContribute and it points
> ProtocolBuffer things to YARN Readme which is already updated to 2.5.0 now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Junping
>
>
I remember spending time on that page trying to document protobuf,
We need to make a call on what blockers will be. From my limited understanding,
this doesn't seem like a API or a compatibility issue. Can we not fix it in
subsequent bug-fix releases?
I do see a lot of follow up releases to 2.1.0. Getting this release out will
help downstream projects start t
On Friday, August 16, 2013, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 16 August 2013 10:05, Andrew Pennebaker
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the link!
> >
> > I understand a lack of support *for* IPv6, what I don't understand is why
> > IPv6 must be disabled in order for Hadoop to work. On systems with both
> >
That makes sense too.
On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
wrote:
>
> We need to make a call on what blockers will be. From my limited
> understanding, this doesn't seem like a API or a compatibility issue. Can we
> not fix it in subsequent bug-fix releases?
>
> I do see a lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Suresh Srinivas reopened HADOOP-9745:
-
> TestZKFailoverController test fails
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9745.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
> TestZKFailoverController test fails
> --
It's your call, Arun. I.e. as long you believe rc2 meets the expectations and
objectives of 2.1.0-beta.
Kihwal
From: Arun Murthy
To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org"
Cc: Kihwal Lee ; "mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org"
; "hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org"
; "yarn-.
I've changed the target version of HADOOP-9880 to 2.1.1. Please change it
back, if you feel that it needs to be in 2.1.0-beta.
Kihwal
From: Kihwal Lee
To: Arun Murthy ; "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org"
Cc: "mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" ;
"hdfs-...@hado
Kai Zheng created HADOOP-9881:
-
Summary: Some questions and possible improvement for
MiniKdc/TestMiniKdc
Key: HADOOP-9881
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9881
Project: Hadoop Common
What are the downsides of getting this fix into the 2.1? It appears
that the fix is pretty isolated and well understood.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Kihwal Lee wrote:
> I've changed the target version of HADOOP-9880 to 2.1.1. Please change it
> back, if you feel
There are other such isolated and well understood bug-fixes that we pushed to
2.1.1 in the interesting of making progress with 2.1.0 and the corresponding
API changes.
2.1.1 should happen soon enough after this.
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Aug 16, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> What are t
Yep, there are quite a number of such fixes in 2.1.1 ATM, I think it will serve
us better to get 2.1.0 out and then quickly turn around to make 2.1.1.
My current plan is to start work on 2.1.1 right after this release gets
complete… hopefully next week.
thanks,
Arun
On Aug 16, 2013, at 4:36 PM
Gang,
I spent time looking through changes slated for hadoop-2.1.1-beta and things
look fairly contained (~10 or so changes for each of Common, HDFS, YARN &
MapReduce).
Can I, henceforth, request committers to exercise large dollops of caution
when committing to branch-2.1-beta? This way I h
Folks,
I am getting started on the
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute section
of Hadoop.
I attempted to run all the unit test cases on a fresh checked-out code from
the hadoop common trunk
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk: revision -
1513368). But I am seem to be ge
22 matches
Mail list logo
