RE: Buiding Hadoop code from source

Hi Vikas, I you want to checkout the latest source code and compile and build then I think Hadoop wiki would be the best source to see the steps. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute -Original Message- From: Vikas Jadhav [mailto:vikascjadha...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 01

Jenkins build is back to normal : Hadoop-Common-trunk #699

See

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9350) Hadoop not building against Java7 on OSX

Steve Loughran created HADOOP-9350: -- Summary: Hadoop not building against Java7 on OSX Key: HADOOP-9350 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9350 Project: Hadoop Common Issue T

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9350) Hadoop not building against Java7 on OSX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran resolved HADOOP-9350. Resolution: Won't Fix > Hadoop not building against Java7 on OSX > --

Re: Buiding Hadoop code from source

+1 Just getting started, I was looking for this too :) Thanks! ~~ Noelle Jakusz Skype: noelle.jakusz Phone: (419) 862-5463 http://about.me/noellejakusz On Mar 1, 2013, at 3:47 AM, "Agarwal, Nikhil" mailto:nikhil.agar...@netapp.com>> wrote: Hi Vikas, I you want to checkout the latest source co

Re: Buiding Hadoop code from source

I write down my steps of compiling hadoop 1.1 here: http://yiyujia.blogspot.com/2012/10/steps-to-compile-hadoop-on-centos-63.html I basically follow articles on the apache wiki. I just add some steps that not expilicitly mentioned like preparing googel protocolBuffer etc. On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at

Re: Buiding Hadoop code from source

thank you all Working on ubuntu svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-trunk just want to know how to create jar of changed code and deploy total hadoop framework i followed 1) svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-trunk 2) ant

RE: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

That's sounds like a reasonable approach. Like you say below, we need to ensure is that the Java side of OS specific optimizations is generic and wont need drastic surgery when that optimization is ported to another platform. Bikas -Original Message- From: Uma Maheswara Rao G [mailto:mahe

Re: Buiding Hadoop code from source

Vikas, are you trying to build trunk? You will need Maven 3.0. I recommend checking out the source tree and reading BUILDING.txt which has detailed instructions, including how to build jar packages. --Arpit On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Vikas Jadhav wrote: > thank you all > Working on ubuntu

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9351) Hadoop daemon startup scripts cause duplication of command line arguments

Chris Nauroth created HADOOP-9351: - Summary: Hadoop daemon startup scripts cause duplication of command line arguments Key: HADOOP-9351 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9351 Project:

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9347) add instructions to BUILDING.txt describing how to build on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9347. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk-win Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I committe

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9348) address TODO in winutils to add more command line usage and examples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9348. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk-win Hadoop Flags: Reviewed +1. Commit

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

-1 We should have a CI infrastructure in place before we can commit to supporting Windows platform. Eric is right Win/Cygwin was supported since day one. I had a Windows box under my desk running nightly builds back in 2006-07. People were irritated but I was filing windows bugs until 0.22 release

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

Konstantin- There's no debate on the necessity of CI and related infrastructure to support the platform well. Suresh outlined the support to effect this here: http://s.apache.org/s1 Is the commitment to establish this infrastructure after the merge sufficient? -C On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:18 PM,

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

Commitment is a good thing. I think the two builds that I proposed are a prerequisite for Win support. If we commit windows patch people will start breaking it the next day. Which we wont know without the nightly build and wont be able to fix without the on-demand one. Making two builds is less th

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9352) Expose UGI.setLoginUser for tests

Daryn Sharp created HADOOP-9352: --- Summary: Expose UGI.setLoginUser for tests Key: HADOOP-9352 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9352 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improveme

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

It seems that with the HW in place, the matter of setting at least nightly build is trivial for anyone with up to date Windows knowledge. I wish I could help. Going without a validation is a recipe for a disaster IMO. -1 until some reasonable solution is implemented. Cos On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Commitment is a good thing. > I think the two builds that I proposed are a prerequisite for Win support. > If we commit windows patch people will start breaking it the next day. > Which we wont know without the nightly build and wont be

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

On Mar 1, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Commitment is a good thing. > I think the two builds that I proposed are a prerequisite for Win support. > If we commit windows patch people will start breaking it the next day. > Which we wont know without the nightly build and wont be abl

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

Sanjay, This is really confusing now. Does Hadoop intend to support Windows by committing this patch? If not, when the declaration of the "official" support comes in and what does it mean? Committing a 500K patch just to make things "not worth" doesn't make sense to me. If the support for this is

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

Suresh, I appreciate all the troubles you're going through wrt syncing up the huge patch for a long time - I really do. I am not asking to have full test-patch process in place. But I think it is a real good idea to have a way to run the full test suite once in a while - or as Konstantin proposing