On 17 December 2012 16:06, Tom White wrote:
> There are some tests like the S3 tests that end with "Test" (e.g.
> Jets3tNativeS3FileSystemContractTest) - unlike normal tests which
> start with "Test". Only those that start with "Test" are run
> automatically (see the surefire configuration in
> h
On 18 December 2012 09:05, Colin McCabe wrote:
>
> I think the way to go is to have one XML file include another.
>
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
>
> boring.config.1
> boring-value
> ... etc, etc...
>
>
>
> That way, you can keep the boring configuration under v
On 18 December 2012 09:11, Colin McCabe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Colin McCabe
> wrote:
>
> >
> >> another tactic could be to have specific test projects: test-s3,
> >> test-openstack, test-... which contain nothing but test cases. You'd set
> >> jenkins up those test projects to
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Steve Loughran
> wrote:
>> On 17 December 2012 16:06, Tom White wrote:
>>
>>> There are some tests like the S3 tests that end with "Test" (e.g.
>>> Jets3tNativeS3FileSystemContractTest) - unlike normal test
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 17 December 2012 16:06, Tom White wrote:
>
>> There are some tests like the S3 tests that end with "Test" (e.g.
>> Jets3tNativeS3FileSystemContractTest) - unlike normal tests which
>> start with "Test". Only those that start with "Test"
On 17 December 2012 16:06, Tom White wrote:
> There are some tests like the S3 tests that end with "Test" (e.g.
> Jets3tNativeS3FileSystemContractTest) - unlike normal tests which
> start with "Test". Only those that start with "Test" are run
> automatically (see the surefire configuration in
> h
There are some tests like the S3 tests that end with "Test" (e.g.
Jets3tNativeS3FileSystemContractTest) - unlike normal tests which
start with "Test". Only those that start with "Test" are run
automatically (see the surefire configuration in
hadoop-project/pom.xml). You have to run the others manua
thanks, I'l; have a look. I've always wanted to add the notion of skipped
to test runs -all the way through to the XML and generated reports, but
you'd have to do a new junit runner for this and tweak the reporting code.
Which, if it involved going near maven source, is not something I am
prepared
One approach we've taken in the past is making the junit test skip
itself when some precondition is not true. Then, we often create a
property which people can use to cause the skipped tests to become a
hard error.
For example, all the tests that rely on libhadoop start with these lines:
> @Test
The swiftfs tests need only to run if there's a target filesystem; copying
the s3/s3n tests, something like
test.fs.swift.name
swift://your-object-store-herel/
How does one actually go about making junit tests optional in mvn-land?
Should the probe/skip logic be in the code -which c
10 matches
Mail list logo