>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I actually would like to see both archival storage and single replica
>>>>>>>> memory writes to be in 2.6 release. Archival storage is in the
t;>>>> in the final stages to be merged to branch-2.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>> Tsz-Wo
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>&g
00 AM, Suresh Srinivas <
> >>>>>> sur...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I actually would like to see b
rks.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I actually would like to see both archival storage and single
> replica
> >>>>>>
6581 gets ready sooner. Both of
>>>>> these
>>>>>>> features are being in development for sometime.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Andrew Wang <
>>>> andrew.w...@cloudera.com>
>&
; stages
>>>>>>> of getting ready for branch-2 merge as Nicholas has already indicated
>>>> on
>>>>>>> the dev mailing list. Hopefully HDFS-6581 gets ready sooner. Both of
>>>>> these
>>>>>>> features are bei
ngly?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the KMS and transparent encryption are ready to go. We've
>> got
>>> a
>>>>>> very few further bug fixes pending, but that's it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Two
eds a little more work before it goes into
> > branch-2.
> > > >> HDFS-6581 hasn't even been merged to trunk yet, so seems a bit
> further
> > > off
> > > >> yet.
> > > >>
> > > >&g
it - hopefully in the next few weeks.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy
> wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > With hadoop-2.5 nearly done, it's time to start thinking ahead to
> > hadoop-
e
> > > > >> archival storage (HDFS-6584) and single replica memory writes
> > > > (HDFS-6581),
> > > > >> which I believe are under the HSM banner. HDFS-6484 was just
> merged
> > to
> > > > >> trunk and I think needs a litt
ingle replica memory writes
> > > (HDFS-6581),
> > > >> which I believe are under the HSM banner. HDFS-6484 was just merged
> to
> > > >> trunk and I think needs a little more work before it goes into
> > branch-2.
> > > >> HDFS-6581 hasn'
work directly on these features. I just
> > generally
> > >> shy away from shipping bits quite this fresh.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Andrew
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:03 PM,
t;> Andrew
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Arun Murthy
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Looks like most of the content is in and hadoop-2.6 is shaping up
> nicely.
> >> >
> >> > I'll create branch-2.6 by end of the week
n Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Arun Murthy wrote:
>>
>> > Looks like most of the content is in and hadoop-2.6 is shaping up nicely.
>> >
>> > I'll create branch-2.6 by end of the week and we can go from there to
>> > stabilize it - hopefully in the n
did not work directly on these features. I just
> > > generally
> > > > > shy away from shipping bits quite this fresh.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 2
t; > generally
> > > > shy away from shipping bits quite this fresh.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Arun Murthy
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > &g
he content is in and hadoop-2.6 is shaping up
> > nicely.
> > > >
> > > > I'll create branch-2.6 by end of the week and we can go from there to
> > > > stabilize it - hopefully in the next few weeks.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
&g
; >
> > > Looks like most of the content is in and hadoop-2.6 is shaping up
> nicely.
> > >
> > > I'll create branch-2.6 by end of the week and we can go from there to
> > > stabilize it - hopefully in the next few weeks.
> > >
> > >
run Murthy
> wrote:
> >
> > > Looks like most of the content is in and hadoop-2.6 is shaping up
> nicely.
> > >
> > > I'll create branch-2.6 by end of the week and we can go from there to
> > > stabilize it - hopefully in the next few weeks.
> &g
to
> > stabilize it - hopefully in the next few weeks.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Arun
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > With hadoop-2.5
;
> I'll create branch-2.6 by end of the week and we can go from there to
> stabilize it - hopefully in the next few weeks.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy
> wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> >
gt;
> With hadoop-2.5 nearly done, it's time to start thinking ahead to
> hadoop-2.6.
>
> Currently, here is the Roadmap per the wiki:
>
> • HADOOP
> • Credential provider HADOOP-10607
> • HDFS
> • Heterogeneous storage (
Sorry, coming to discussion late.
We all agreed that 2.6 would the *last* release supporting JDK6 and
hadoop-2.7 would drop support for JDK6. We could easily do 2.7 right after
2.6 (maybe with few critical bug-fixes) with the defining feature of 2.7
being *JDK7 only*. I've checked with HBase, Pig
There's actually an umbrella JIRA to track issues with JDK8
(HADOOP-11090), in case anyone missed it.
At LinkedIn we've been running our Hadoop 2.3 deployment on JDK8 for
about a month now with some mixed results. It definitely works but
there are issues, mostly around virtual memory exploding.
On Sep 17, 2014, at 2:47 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> I don't agree. Certainly the stuff I got into Hadoop 2.5 nailed down the
> filesystem binding with more tests than ever before.
FWIW, based upon my survey of JIRA, there are a lot of unit test fixes
that are only in trunk.
> But
gt; to
> > the list? We have most of the patches for the sub-JIRAs under review and
> > have committed a couple.
> >
> > -Subru
> >
> > -- Forwarded message --
> >
> > From: Arun C Murthy
> >
> > Date: Tue, Aug 12, 2014 a
On Sep 15, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>>
>>It’s now September. With the passage of time, I have a lot of doubts
>> about this plan and where that trajectory takes us.
>>
>> * The list of changes that are already
e patches for the sub-JIRAs under review and
>> have committed a couple.
>>
>> -Subru
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>>
>> From: Arun C Murthy
>>
>> Date: Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM
>>
>> Subject: Thinking ahead to ha
he sub-JIRAs under review and
> have committed a couple.
>
> -Subru
>
> -- Forwarded message --
>
> From: Arun C Murthy
>
> Date: Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM
>
> Subject: Thinking ahead to hadoop-2.6
>
> To: "common-dev@hadoop
e, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM
Subject: Thinking ahead to hadoop-2.6
To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "
hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org" , "
mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" ,
"yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org"
Folks,
With hadoop-2.5 nearly done, i
Folks,
With hadoop-2.5 nearly done, it's time to start thinking ahead to hadoop-2.6.
Currently, here is the Roadmap per the wiki:
• HADOOP
• Credential provider HADOOP-10607
• HDFS
• Heterogeneous storage (Phase 2) - Support APIs for
31 matches
Mail list logo
