Re: Security in 0.23

2012-01-04 Thread Arun C Murthy
On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Robert Evans wrote: > > It should have all of the same security. Some of it has been renamed, and > some of the token work is still on going. The LinuxTaskController has been > renamed because "Tasks" are map reduce specific. It is now the > LinuxContainerExecu

Re: Security in 0.23

2012-01-04 Thread Robert Evans
It should have all of the same security. Some of it has been renamed, and some of the token work is still on going. The LinuxTaskController has been renamed because "Tasks" are map reduce specific. It is now the LinuxContainerExecutor. I don't remember all of the updated config names, off t

Security in 0.23

2012-01-04 Thread Benoy Antony
Hi All, Does 0.23 have all the security features compared to (205 ) ? I do not see the LinuxTaskController class and c++ code which enables the ownership of the task processes. Which are the missing security features ? Thanks and Regards, Benoy Antony