Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2

2010-01-30 Thread Stack
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Hairong Kuang wrote: > TestFiDataTransferProtocol2 tests HDFS-101. I reversed the change made by > HDFS-101 from my local HDFS trunk and ran the test. The test failed. It > seems to me that we still need HDFS-101 in 0.20. > It would seem so. Let me know if you n

Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2

2010-01-29 Thread Hairong Kuang
TestFiDataTransferProtocol2 tests HDFS-101. I reversed the change made by HDFS-101 from my local HDFS trunk and ran the test. The test failed. It seems to me that we still need HDFS-101 in 0.20. Hairong On 1/29/10 10:10 AM, "Hairong Kuang" wrote: > Stack, > > Could you please check if hbase st

Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2

2010-01-29 Thread Hairong Kuang
Stack, Could you please check if hbase still needs HDFS-101? I am not sure if HDFS-793 itself solves the problem that HDFS-101 intends to solve. Hairong On 1/29/10 8:55 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > On Jan 26, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Owen: is there a particular rush for 0.

Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2

2010-01-29 Thread Owen O'Malley
On Jan 26, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: Owen: is there a particular rush for 0.20.2 or can we hold out for these patches? Pig needs one of the fixes in 0.20.2, so they would like it to be sooner rather than later. It sounds like getting HDFS-127 committed to 0.20.2, so let's see

Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2

2010-01-27 Thread Todd Lipcon
> > > > -Todd > > > > 2010/1/26 Kay Kay > > > >> Is HDFS-127 going to be part of it ? (seems to have been committed as > per > >> the jira). > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 1/26/10 6:53 PM, Konstanti

Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2

2010-01-27 Thread Stack
have been committed as per >> the jira). >> >> >> >> >> On 1/26/10 6:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:56AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I'm planning on rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 today. Are there any blockers >>>> that can't wait? >>>> >>>> -- Owen >>>> >>>> >>> >> >

Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2

2010-01-26 Thread Todd Lipcon
Kay > Is HDFS-127 going to be part of it ? (seems to have been committed as per > the jira). > > > > > On 1/26/10 6:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> +1 >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:56AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >> >>> I'

Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2

2010-01-26 Thread Kay Kay
Is HDFS-127 going to be part of it ? (seems to have been committed as per the jira). On 1/26/10 6:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: +1 On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:56AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: I'm planning on rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 today. Are there any blockers that can't wait? -- Owen

Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2

2010-01-26 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
+1 On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:56AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'm planning on rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 today. Are there any blockers > that can't wait? > > -- Owen

Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2

2010-01-26 Thread Todd Lipcon
DFS-127 is critical for HBase and easy to reproduce. HDFS-101 lacks a solid test-case in branch-20 so I think it can wait. -Todd On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'm planning on rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 today. Are there any blockers that > can't wait? > > -- Owen >

Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2

2010-01-26 Thread Owen O'Malley
I'm planning on rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 today. Are there any blockers that can't wait? -- Owen