Resent.
- Forwarded Message -
From: Tsz Wo Sze
To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: Requirements for patch review
>> The wording here is ambiguous, though, whether the committer who
>> provides the minimum
I filed HADOOP-8248 with a diff to the bylaws.
Thanks
-Todd
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Some discussion between Nicholas, Aaron, and me started in the
>> comments of HDFS-3168 which I think is better
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Some discussion between Nicholas, Aaron, and me started in the
> comments of HDFS-3168 which I think is better exposed on the mailing
> list instead of trailing an already-committed JIRA.
>
> The question at hand is what the policy
I personally like the clarification and it is in line with how I understood the
original bylaw when I read it. I don't really want this to turn into a legal
document but as this is getting more explicit with clarification it would be
nice to put in a small exception for release managers when th
Hi folks,
Some discussion between Nicholas, Aaron, and me started in the
comments of HDFS-3168 which I think is better exposed on the mailing
list instead of trailing an already-committed JIRA.
The question at hand is what the policy is with regarding our
review-then-commit policies. The bylaws s
