On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Hairong Kuang wrote:
> TestFiDataTransferProtocol2 tests HDFS-101. I reversed the change made by
> HDFS-101 from my local HDFS trunk and ran the test. The test failed. It
> seems to me that we still need HDFS-101 in 0.20.
>
It would seem so.
Let me know if you n
TestFiDataTransferProtocol2 tests HDFS-101. I reversed the change made by
HDFS-101 from my local HDFS trunk and ran the test. The test failed. It
seems to me that we still need HDFS-101 in 0.20.
Hairong
On 1/29/10 10:10 AM, "Hairong Kuang" wrote:
> Stack,
>
> Could you please check if hbase st
Stack,
Could you please check if hbase still needs HDFS-101? I am not sure if
HDFS-793 itself solves the problem that HDFS-101 intends to solve.
Hairong
On 1/29/10 8:55 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
>
> On Jan 26, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
>> Owen: is there a particular rush for 0.
On Jan 26, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
Owen: is there a particular rush for 0.20.2 or can we hold out for
these
patches?
Pig needs one of the fixes in 0.20.2, so they would like it to be
sooner rather than later. It sounds like getting HDFS-127 committed to
0.20.2, so let's see
I don't think 101 is a real blocker - I haven't been able to reliably
produce it. HDFS-793 fixes most of the issues I've seen in practice, and we
now have a new patch in branch-20 which should fix that.
127 would be nice - there's a patch on that JIRA waiting for review as
below.
-Todd
On Wed, J
If the new release included (fixedup) hdfs-127 and hdfs-101, the hbase
crew would be big fans of an hadoop 0.20.2.
St.Ack
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> HDFS-127 was originally committed, then rolled back from 0.20 as it caused
> test timeouts due to infinite loop. I put a
HDFS-127 was originally committed, then rolled back from 0.20 as it caused
test timeouts due to infinite loop. I put a new patch up there but it has
not been reviewed, and thus not committed.
Owen: is there a particular rush for 0.20.2 or can we hold out for these
patches?
-Todd
2010/1/26 Kay Ka
Is HDFS-127 going to be part of it ? (seems to have been committed as
per the jira).
On 1/26/10 6:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
+1
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:56AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
I'm planning on rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 today. Are there any blockers
that can't wait?
-- Owen
+1
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:56AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> I'm planning on rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 today. Are there any blockers
> that can't wait?
>
> -- Owen
In my opinion, I think we should apply the new patch for HDFS-127. Also,
there hasn't been a new patch made yet for HDFS-101.
Not sure if these should be classified as blockers, since they're not
regressions, but I do think they need to go into a branch-20 release at some
point. HDFS-127 is critic
10 matches
Mail list logo
