oh certainly, that's always an option. And sounds like the one we'll
pursue.
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:59 AM Steve Loughran
wrote:
> it;s com.hadoop, but still tainted.
>
> couldn't we have com.twitter.hadoop?
>
> On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 15:23, Sean Busbey
> wrote:
>
> > As an ASF project we can
it;s com.hadoop, but still tainted.
couldn't we have com.twitter.hadoop?
On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 15:23, Sean Busbey wrote:
> As an ASF project we can not distribute GPL code. As an ASF project it’s
> also our job to defend our trademarks.
>
> We should actively prevent this GPL code from going to
As an ASF project we can not distribute GPL code. As an ASF project it’s also
our job to defend our trademarks.
We should actively prevent this GPL code from going to maven central with our
name attached to it.
> On May 5, 2022, at 1:49 PM, Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote:
>
> Please be careful.
> So
Please be careful.
Sorry but hadoop-lzo is GPL licensed. Internally at my employer we don't
use/ship hadoop-lzo because of the licensing concerns.
I suppose since the code is GPL we as an Apache project want to stay away
from it?
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 11:17 AM Ayush Saxena wrote:
> Didn’t read
