Re: Not able to compile 0.23 - may be HADOOP-6614

2011-11-21 Thread Eli Collins
Sorry about that guys, I messed up the merge of HADOOP-6614 from trunk. On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Harsh J wrote: > Ah my bad. Yes, branch-0.23 is separated. I was compiling trunk and noticed > this to be a non issue :) > > On 21-Nov-2011, at 10:18 PM, Praveen Sripati wrote: > >> Harsh, >>

Re: Not able to compile 0.23 - may be HADOOP-6614

2011-11-21 Thread Harsh J
Ah my bad. Yes, branch-0.23 is separated. I was compiling trunk and noticed this to be a non issue :) On 21-Nov-2011, at 10:18 PM, Praveen Sripati wrote: > Harsh, > > Branch-0.23 has "File workDir;" while the trunk has "final File workDir;" > in RunJar.java. > > For the 0.23 build, should I ge

Re: Not able to compile 0.23 - may be HADOOP-6614

2011-11-21 Thread Mahadev Konar
Praveen, There is a fix being worked on in HADOOP-7843. Hope that helps. thanks mahadev On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Praveen Sripati wrote: > Harsh, > > Branch-0.23 has "File workDir;" while the trunk has "final File workDir;" > in RunJar.java. > > For the 0.23 build, should I get the code

Re: Not able to compile 0.23 - may be HADOOP-6614

2011-11-21 Thread Jonathan Eagles
HADOOP-7843 is filed to address the issue branch-0.23 On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Praveen Sripati wrote: > Hi, > > I got the latest code from branch-0.23 and got the below error. Think this > is related to HADOOP-6614. > > [ERROR] > > /home

Re: Not able to compile 0.23 - may be HADOOP-6614

2011-11-21 Thread Praveen Sripati
Harsh, Branch-0.23 has "File workDir;" while the trunk has "final File workDir;" in RunJar.java. For the 0.23 build, should I get the code from branch-0.23 or trunk? I thought that the 0.23 release was build from branch-0.23. Thanks, Praveen On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Harsh J wrote: > T

Re: Not able to compile 0.23 - may be HADOOP-6614

2011-11-21 Thread Harsh J
This appears to have already been fixed since a7654ba4324a1cc831fcef3988d9dca767bcdef3. I can compile the trunk right now -- try a fetch+rebase/pull/up again perhaps? But yes, that value has to be final as the compiler noted. On 21-Nov-2011, at 8:22 PM, Praveen Sripati wrote: > Hi, > > I got