Re: Maintaining documentations

Done, thanks guys for finding and fixing doc issues! On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Akira AJISAKA wrote: > Thank you for reviewing and committing, Arpit! > > > > HADOOP-6350 - not sure of the status. Is the attached patch ready for > > review? > > The patch is not ready. I need to add the new

Re: Maintaining documentations

Thank you for reviewing and committing, Arpit! > HADOOP-6350 - not sure of the status. Is the attached patch ready for > review? The patch is not ready. I need to add the new metrics for the latest trunk. I'll create a new patch in this week. In addition, could you please review HADOOP-9830? Th

Re: Maintaining documentations

I committed the following patches today: HADOOP-10086 HADOOP-9982 HADOOP-10212 HDFS-5297 Remaining from your initial list: HADOOP-10139 - needs to be rebased HDFS-5492 - I will review it this week. HADOOP-6350 - not sure of the status. Is the attached patch ready for review? I will look at the

Re: Maintaining documentations

>> Akira, could you please resend a list of your patches that need reviewing >> if you have it handy. Here is the list of all the documentation patches I have. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6350?jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20HDFS%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20resolution%20

Re: Maintaining documentations

> I will review HADOOP-10086this > week unless another committer gets to it first. I appreciate it Arpit! > Thanks for your efforts to clean up the documentation. Unfortunately some > fixes can get lost in the noise and this is true not just

Re: Maintaining documentations

I will review HADOOP-10086this week unless another committer gets to it first. Akira, could you please resend a list of your patches that need reviewing if you have it handy. Thanks for your efforts to clean up the documentation. Unfortunately

Re: Maintaining documentations

Hi All, I wrote several patches for documentation but most of them are not reviewed. I want to improve not only the new features but also the documents. I also think the documents are not well maintained mainly because : * Deprecated commands and parameters still exist. * Undocumented command