I like it, even if gcs want to be more agile at first
1. can help testing/debugging against a broadly used store
2. stops us accidentally breaking things (who would do that 🙂)
3. makes it easier to do changes across the modules
Because Chris is involved, I'm not worried about this being
Hi Wei-Chiu,
This is an important trade-off to consider. There is some discussion in the
JIRA issue comments relevant to this topic. To summarize, we prefer closer
integration with the ASF community as we continue to evolve this
FileSystem. It's true that releases will operate at a different caden
Chris,
I'm curious is having a GCS fs implementation in the main Hadoop repo the
right choice? As mentioned by Steve, Hadoop release cadence tends to be
slow. There's a lot of legacy code so release work is usually a multi month
effort. Have you considered having it in a separate repo?
On Mon, Apr
