Re: Guidance needed on HADOOP-13096 and HADOOP-13097

2016-05-06 Thread larry mccay
I agree with your rationale for not doing C now. And those clean up tasks can more easily be discussed when separated from this effort. On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > After thinking about it, I think you are correct here: I’m more > inclined to do D w/follow-u

Re: Guidance needed on HADOOP-13096 and HADOOP-13097

2016-05-06 Thread Allen Wittenauer
After thinking about it, I think you are correct here: I’m more inclined to do D w/follow-up JIRAs to fix this up. The hadoop and hdfs script functionality is being tested, so it isn’t like HADOOP-12930 is going in with zero unit tests. Never mind that large chunks of hadoop-tools gets m

Re: Guidance needed on HADOOP-13096 and HADOOP-13097

2016-05-05 Thread Larry McCay
I would vote for C or D with a filed JIRA to clean up the maven structure as a separate effort. Before moving to D, could you describe any reason to not go with C? On May 4, 2016, at 9:51 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > When the sub-projects re-merged, maven work was done, whatever, the