Re: Checksum file for 3.3.6 release slightly wrong

2023-10-09 Thread Lars Francke
Thanks Steve! On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:40 PM Steve Loughran wrote: > > mukund is planning a new release soon, one with updated dependencies and > things. I will validate the checksums > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 16:24, Lars Francke wrote: >> >> Thanks for the quick response. >> No worries at all,

Re: Checksum file for 3.3.6 release slightly wrong

2023-10-09 Thread Steve Loughran
mukund is planning a new release soon, one with updated dependencies and things. I will validate the checksums On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 16:24, Lars Francke wrote: > Thanks for the quick response. > No worries at all, it just made our scripts fail on the checksum. > > So, yeah. It'd be great if - in

Re: Checksum file for 3.3.6 release slightly wrong

2023-10-09 Thread Lars Francke
Thanks for the quick response. No worries at all, it just made our scripts fail on the checksum. So, yeah. It'd be great if - in the future - the "correct" checksum files were to be used instead. On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 4:48 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > > Hi that's a good catch > The RC1 was used

Re: Checksum file for 3.3.6 release slightly wrong

2023-10-06 Thread Wei-Chiu Chuang
Hi that's a good catch The RC1 was used for official release, and instead of using the build script to create an entirely new release tarball I simply updated the file names. Probably shouldn't do so. On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 6:00 AM Lars Francke wrote: > Hi, > > the checksum file for the 3.3.6 re