With I believe 9 +1s (7 binding), the vote passes. Thanks all for voting
and the very helpful discussion, I'll file a JIRA and get this content in a
more accessible place.
Best,
Andrew
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks,
> Sangjin
>
> On Tue, Aug
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
Sangjin
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Ravi Prakash wrote:
> +1. Thanks
>
>
>
> On Monday, August 24, 2015 3:02 PM, Jing Zhao
> wrote:
>
>
> +1. Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Zhe Zhang wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding. Thanks Andrew!
> >
> > ---
>
+1. Thanks
On Monday, August 24, 2015 3:02 PM, Jing Zhao wrote:
+1. Thanks.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Zhe Zhang wrote:
> +1 non-binding. Thanks Andrew!
>
> ---
> Zhe Zhang
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Karthik Kambatla
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks for driving t
+1. Thanks.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Zhe Zhang wrote:
> +1 non-binding. Thanks Andrew!
>
> ---
> Zhe Zhang
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Karthik Kambatla
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks for driving this, Andrew.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Vinayakumar B >
> > wrot
+1 non-binding. Thanks Andrew!
---
Zhe Zhang
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Karthik Kambatla
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for driving this, Andrew.
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Vinayakumar B
> wrote:
>
> > +1,
> >
> > -Vinay
> > On Aug 24, 2015 11:29 PM, "Colin P. McCabe" wrote:
> >
> >
+1
Thanks for driving this, Andrew.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Vinayakumar B
wrote:
> +1,
>
> -Vinay
> On Aug 24, 2015 11:29 PM, "Colin P. McCabe" wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > cheers,
> > Colin
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Steve Loughran >
> > wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
>
+1,
-Vinay
On Aug 24, 2015 11:29 PM, "Colin P. McCabe" wrote:
> +1
>
> cheers,
> Colin
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Steve Loughran
> wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >> On 21 Aug 2015, at 13:44, Andrew Wang wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi common-dev,
> >>
> >> As promised, here is an official vote t
+1
cheers,
Colin
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>> On 21 Aug 2015, at 13:44, Andrew Wang wrote:
>>
>> Hi common-dev,
>>
>> As promised, here is an official vote thread. Let's run it for the standard
>> 7 days, closing on Aug 28th at noon. Only PMC membe
+1 (binding)
> On 21 Aug 2015, at 13:44, Andrew Wang wrote:
>
> Hi common-dev,
>
> As promised, here is an official vote thread. Let's run it for the standard
> 7 days, closing on Aug 28th at noon. Only PMC members have binding votes,
> but of course everyone's input is welcomed.
>
> If the vo
Understood, and agreed on the need to preserve the commit history. The only
reason I thought I'd comment is that the current proposal explicitly
mentions "git merge --no-ff" when merging the branch to trunk. "--squash"
cannot be combined with "--no-ff", thus I wanted some clarification.
On Fri, Au
>
> I know this is a different topic than the main reason for this vote, but
> has there been a discussion of using a squashed merge as opposed to a
> normal merge when feature branches merge to trunk? Squash merges have some
> advantages including complicating the branch tree.
>
Since this [VOTE]
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Andrew Wang
wrote:
> Hi common-dev,
>
> As promised, here is an official vote thread. Let's run it for the standard
> 7 days, closing on Aug 28th at noon. Only PMC members have binding votes,
> but of course everyone's input is welcomed.
>
> If the vote passes, I'
12 matches
Mail list logo
