Sure, will do. --M
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> Wow; thanks for taking this to ground, Matt.
>
> I don't think we need to rerun the vote. While you've paged it in,
> would you mind adding some of this context to the HowToRelease wiki?
> -C
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at
Wow; thanks for taking this to ground, Matt.
I don't think we need to rerun the vote. While you've paged it in,
would you mind adding some of this context to the HowToRelease wiki?
-C
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Matt Foley wrote:
> Thanks for the reference.
>
> Roy's email clearly says that
Thanks for the reference.
Roy's email clearly says that the thing to be voted on should be source
only. This email is in the context of a discussion about a release
candidate that incorporated jars (from a third-party project) WITHOUT
sources. In particular, the offending project had apparently c
FWIW: http://s.apache.org/nnN
The rest of the thread (and related discussion that month) is fairly
unambiguous about what the PMC is allowed to approve. Elsewhere,
there's clarification that the prohibition is against binaries for
which we don't also distribute source, so (AFAICT) distributing
thi
Hmm. My understanding was that only sources constituted a "release" and
that all release votes were to be understood as votes on a body of source
code. However, we've always (at least for the last 2+ years that I've been
involved in the RM side) distributed binary tarball (and often rpms and
debs)
Thanks, Matt. As always, your work on this is hugely appreciated.
As I understand it, we can't distribute binary-only artifacts. Among
the reasons: the PMC can't verify binaries as project output, the
non-profit charter is about source code, and users need to be able to
modify what we distribute.
The vote passed and we have accepted Hadoop version 1.2.0 for release:
+1 binding: 4 (1 slightly late)
+1 non-binding: 1
0 none
-1 none
Thanks to all who voted.
I'll finish publishing the release tonight and announce it to general@ in
the morning.
Best regards,
--Matt
release manager
On Mon, Ma
Hi Chris,
Unless I screwed up my build, hadoop-1.2.0.tar.gz includes the built
artifacts as well as full buildable source and docs.
Hadoop-1.2.0-bin.tar.gz is intended to contain only the built artifacts
("binaries") and deliberately excludes the source
and docs, for those who wish a smaller tarbal
+1 on hadoop-1.2.0.tar.gz (verified checksums, signature, ran some unit tests)
but hadoop-1.2.0-bin.tar.gz is missing the source code and can't be built. -C
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Matt Foley wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have posted the signed tarballs for Hadoop 1.2.0-rc1 at
> http://people.ap
+1 (binding)
Verified bits and ran sample jobs.
Thanks again, for continuing to do the thankless task Matt!
Arun
On May 6, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Matt Foley wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have posted the signed tarballs for Hadoop 1.2.0-rc1 at
> http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.2.0-rc1/
> Release n
+1 (non-binding)
-downloaded binary distro
-verified checksum and signature
-deployed a new multi-node cluster: 1*NN, 1*JT, 2*DN, 2*TT, 1*2NN
-ran multiple HDFS commands and verified correct behavior
-ran a few sample MR jobs
-verified that 2NN could take a good checkpoint
Thanks for preparing th
That seems reasonable to me. Thanks for considering it!
Jason
On May 11, 2013, at 2:04 PM, "Matt Foley"
mailto:mfo...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
Hi Jason,
It's taken me so long to get this 1.2.0 RC out, that I'd like to finish it and
move on with a 1.2.1 stabilization release.
If I commit to doi
Hi Jason,
It's taken me so long to get this 1.2.0 RC out, that I'd like to finish it
and move on with a 1.2.1 stabilization release.
If I commit to doing 1.2.1 in 3 to 4 weeks, including this HADOOP-9504, would
that be acceptable to you?
Regards,
--Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Jason Low
Matt, would you consider adding HADOOP-9504 to the release? Some groups
using HBase have been bitten by this bug and would like to see it in a
1.x release.
Jason
On 05/10/2013 11:44 AM, Matt Foley wrote:
Hi all,
just a reminder this vote is underway and will close Monday 11:30am.
Please revi
Matt,
Thanks for getting the release out.
I downloaded the tarballs and verified the checksums. I ran the following
tests on a single node cluster:
- Ensured a newly installed cluster can be started and is functional. Also
checked the cluster restarts.
- Checked webUI for HDFS and MapReduce.
- Te
Hi all,
just a reminder this vote is underway and will close Monday 11:30am.
Please review and vote!
Thanks,
--Matt
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Matt Foley wrote:
> Friends,
> Nexus issues are resolved, and the Nexus staging repository for Hadoop
> 1.2.0-rc1 properly uploaded. Thanks for
Friends,
Nexus issues are resolved, and the Nexus staging repository for Hadoop
1.2.0-rc1 properly uploaded. Thanks for your patience.
--Matt
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Matt Foley wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have posted the signed tarballs for Hadoop 1.2.0-rc1 at
> http://people.apache.org/~mat
17 matches
Mail list logo
