I'm pleased to announce that as of last night, the 1.0.3 vote passed with
+1 binding - 4 votes
+1 non-binding - 1 vote
-1 - no votes
Thanks to everyone who tried it out.
I'm in process of publishing it and will announce on hadoop general shortly.
--Matt
Release Manager, Hadoop 1.0
On Tu
Hey Luke, as you know, the security stuff hasn't been tested with IBM's JDK.
I'll submit a patch for 8251 but I wouldn't block 1.0.3 for this.
Thanks
Devaraj
On May 15, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Luke Lu wrote:
> Hey Devaraj,
>
> Thanks for testing IBM JDK. Can you do the one line fix for IBM JDK as
> w
Sorry, meant for Devaraj only :)
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Luke Lu wrote:
> Hey Devaraj,
>
> Thanks for testing IBM JDK. Can you do the one line fix for IBM JDK as
> well for HADOOP-8251, as Todd only fixed Sun JDK. It's not blocker for
> 1.0.3. But much easier for you to submit a patch. I
Hey Devaraj,
Thanks for testing IBM JDK. Can you do the one line fix for IBM JDK as
well for HADOOP-8251, as Todd only fixed Sun JDK. It's not blocker for
1.0.3. But much easier for you to submit a patch. I already have 14
patches in the queue waiting for our legal approval. Doing a code scan
for
I download all the artifacts and verified checksums for all the tar bundle,
rpms, debs. Ran on my machine, using tar bundle, TestDFSIO tests,
TestMapRed, mrbench and nnbench.
+1 for the 1.0.3-rc1 release.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Matt Foley wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> release Candidate for
[Sorry I accidentally hit "Reply" instead of "Reply All" on thread below.
Adding back common-dev@ ]
I'm planning to do a first turn on 1.1 next week. Because so much new
stuff went into it, I'm anticipating that there will need to be some
stabilization before I can call a vote on an RC.
--Matt
+1 (binding)
I downloaded the release, built (non-secure) with IBM's JDK [IBM J9 VM (build
2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux amd64-64 jvmxa6460sr10-20111207_96808 (JIT
enabled, AOT enabled)]. Ran the sleep job successfully on a single node
cluster.
On May 8, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Matt Foley wrote:
+1 (non binding)
ran system tests on secure and non secure deploys and found no regression
issues.
--
Arpit Gupta
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On May 8, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Matt Foley wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
> release Candidate for Hadoop-1.0.3 is now available for vote, at
>http:/
Can we include HADOOP-8399 that takes care about annoyance of Java5 need?
Cos
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 07:11PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have verified all signatures and message digests.═ I also have
> - tested WebHDFS with curl;
> - run pi with 3 maps and 100 samples per
Hi,
I have verified all signatures and message digests. I also have
- tested WebHDFS with curl;
- run pi with 3 maps and 100 samples per map, the estimated value of Pi is
3.14156800; and
- run distbbp to compute the billionth bits of pi.
All results look good.
+1 on rc1.
Regar
10 matches
Mail list logo
