Re: Hadoop-1.0.3 and 1.1 release / code freeze proposals

2012-04-30 Thread Thomas Graves
You might consider pulling in these 4 jira. The are all minor but aid in debugging: MAPREDUCE-4012, MAPREDUCE-4003, MAPREDUCE-1238, and MAPREDUCE-4017. These are all already in 1.1.0. Tom On 4/20/12 8:02 PM, "Matt Foley" wrote: > Hi all, > a couple major bugs have shown up in Hadoop-1.0.2.

Re: Hadoop-1.0.3 and 1.1 release / code freeze proposals

2012-04-25 Thread Kihwal Lee
I found HDFS-1041 missing from branch-1. Since it was committed to 0.20.2 and yahoo-merge before the creation of 0.20-security, I think it got dropped by accident. Kihwal On 4/24/12 2:27 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Matt Foley wrote: > Hi all, > a couple major b

Re: Hadoop-1.0.3 and 1.1 release / code freeze proposals

2012-04-24 Thread Eli Collins
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Matt Foley wrote: > Hi all, > a couple major bugs have shown up in Hadoop-1.0.2.  I propose to make a > 1.0.3 release containing fixes for: >  - MAPREDUCE-4154 > streaming > MR job succeeds even if the streamin

Re: Hadoop-1.0.3 and 1.1 release / code freeze proposals

2012-04-24 Thread Owen O'Malley
I also think we need two minor build problems fixed: HDFS-3316 HADOOP-8307 -- Owen

Re: Hadoop-1.0.3 and 1.1 release / code freeze proposals

2012-04-24 Thread Owen O'Malley
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Kihwal Lee wrote: > I think HADOOP-8294 is a good candidate to include. Without this, a transient > dns problem can make a large number of data nodes unavailable.  The fix is > backport of HADOOP-7428. I'm +1 on HADOOP-8294 (aka HADOOP-7428). Matt?

RE: Hadoop-1.0.3 and 1.1 release / code freeze proposals

2012-04-21 Thread Tim Broberg
WHat needs to happen for HADOOP-7823 to get committed for 1.1.0? - Tim. From: mfo...@hortonworks.com [mfo...@hortonworks.com] On Behalf Of Matt Foley [ma...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 6:02 PM To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Had

Re: Hadoop-1.0.3 and 1.1 release / code freeze proposals

2012-04-21 Thread Kihwal Lee
I think HADOOP-8294 is a good candidate to include. Without this, a transient dns problem can make a large number of data nodes unavailable. The fix is backport of HADOOP-7428. Kihwal On 4/20/12 8:02 PM, "Matt Foley" wrote: Hi all, a couple major bugs have shown up in Hadoop-1.0.2. I propo