On May 4, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
>
>> Do all changes for 0.20.2xx release go through branch-0.20-security,
>> then get merged to a particular -2xx branch?
>
> I've discussed this before on the lists, but here goes:
>
> branch
On May 3, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
> Do all changes for 0.20.2xx release go through branch-0.20-security,
> then get merged to a particular -2xx branch?
I've discussed this before on the lists, but here goes:
branch-0.20-security is the major branch and all changes need to be commi
People requested I move the query to general, will do that.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
> He guys,
>
> Do all changes for 0.20.2xx release go through branch-0.20-security,
> then get merged to a particular -2xx branch?
>
> Why create a new branch for every new dot release?
He guys,
Do all changes for 0.20.2xx release go through branch-0.20-security,
then get merged to a particular -2xx branch?
Why create a new branch for every new dot release? Ie if the intent
that the branch will be dead after release, why not release from a
single branch? It's hard to see that e