There is a maximum length for message buffers that was introduced by
HADOOP-9676. So messages with length 1752330339 should not be
accepted.
best,
Colin
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Dhaivat Pandya
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working a lot with the Hadoop NameNode IPC protocol (while
> build
Can you please share the details on the issue you found?
Sent from phone
> On Dec 29, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote:
>
> Actually, we can relegate this as a non-issue; I have found a different
> source of error in the system.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Dhaivat Pandya
> w
Actually, we can relegate this as a non-issue; I have found a different
source of error in the system.
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote:
> Anyone?
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Dhaivat Pandya
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been working a lot with the Hadoop NameNode
Anyone?
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working a lot with the Hadoop NameNode IPC protocol (while
> building a cache layer on top of Hadoop). I've noticed that for request
> packets coming from the default DFS client that do not have a method name,
> t
Hi,
I've been working a lot with the Hadoop NameNode IPC protocol (while
building a cache layer on top of Hadoop). I've noticed that for request
packets coming from the default DFS client that do not have a method name,
the length field is often *completely *off.
For example, I've been looking at
