On 27/10/10 23:28, Wang, Chengwei wrote:
Thanks for pointing it out!
Because it did not mentioned how may masters in the practice of 4000 nodes, is
there only one master managing 4000 slaves?
Given that you can now get 24 TB worth of HDD in a single server, I
wouldn't worry that much about
Thanks a bunch!
- Original Message -
From: "Konstantin Shvachko"
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 5:09:27 PM
Subject: Re: Multi-Master Hadoop Configuration
Yes. Only one master, called name-node, is managing HDFS, and only one
master, called j
nt: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 6:08:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Multi-Master Hadoop Configuration
>
>
> On Oct 27, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Wang, Chengwei wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've searched for a while on the possibility to configure multiple
> masters to govern larg
On Oct 27, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Wang, Chengwei wrote:
> Thanks for pointing it out!
>
> Because it did not mentioned how may masters in the practice of 4000 nodes,
> is there only one master managing 4000 slaves?
Hadoop only supports one master, so yes.
[At least until the Avata
M
Subject: Re: Multi-Master Hadoop Configuration
On Oct 27, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Wang, Chengwei wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've searched for a while on the possibility to configure multiple masters to
> govern large number of slaves, but I barely found any except for
> multi-ma
On Oct 27, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Wang, Chengwei wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've searched for a while on the possibility to configure multiple masters to
> govern large number of slaves, but I barely found any except for
> multi-masters for backup in HBase. Is one master enough to support thousands
> of
Hi All,
I've searched for a while on the possibility to configure multiple masters to
govern large number of slaves, but I barely found any except for multi-masters
for backup in HBase. Is one master enough to support thousands of slaves? Or in
real we just configure separate Hadoop instances i
